 |
|
| View Poll Results: 1964 or 1965, which do you like best? | |||
| 1964 |
   
|
65 | 32.99% |
| 1965 |
  
|
132 | 67.01% |
| Voters: 197. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
04-24-2016, 07:52 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I have my 64 because it met my criteria for my next purchase: very clean, fun, not necessarily original so I can play with it without overly worrying about ruining a museum piece. And all for a reasonable price.
Early GTOs were never my favorites as I tend to prefer the late 69/early 70 styles in all muscle cars. However, almost like an arranged marriage I guess, I've grown to live it! Specifically, I love the rarity and significance of the first muscle car for sure. I love being different and you do not see nearly as many 64s around. I like the tail lights better on 64 v. 65. I like the machined dash. The horizontal lights are growing I me. I love the hood. I really love the light weight. Yup, I'm happy with my arranged marriage!
__________________
Adam __________________ 1964 LeGTO 469, M21, 3.42   __________________ Sold: 1968 Pontiac LeMans Convertible See it go HERE |
|
|
The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.
Threaded Mode