Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 06-30-2022, 09:47 AM
unruhjonny's Avatar
unruhjonny unruhjonny is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 6,835
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Formulajones View Post
... I've never noticed any real difference between ethanol and non ethanol gas as far as drivability ...
I will chime in on that last post;
Not to argue, or anything of the sort, but to just offer an opposing first hand opinion.

my car:
- engine rebuilt in 1998 (un-needed - because I was a kid, and wanted to do it!?!)
- YZ 400 (0.040 over)
- stock heads, only light cleaning - no port work
- 744 cam installed (installed because what I thought was the stock cam seemed really mild, so I wanted to upgrade to the one step bigger pre-1970 RAIII-MT cam)
- 7041264 carb (it was the best I could find at the time)

When I first learned of the "higher octane" ethanol blended fuel around here, I gave it a try;
I was nearing empty, and put in 1/2 or maybe 3/4 of a tank (because that's all this broke kid could afford).
My car ran like absolute turd with it.
It barely kept an idle, and was just generally unhappy.

So please mark me down as someone who definately could tell the difference when running ethanol blended, vs conventional premium unleaded gas.

It ran so bad that my cousin felt bad for me, and shared some of his av gas;
I topped up the tank with his av gas, and you could quite literally hear when the av gas mixture made it to the carb;
The idle smoothed out unlike I had ever heard it run.

Since that time, I have stayed away from Ethanol blends - if possible.
(I will add that it is possible that the ethanol blending has gotten better since 1999.)

It is probably easy enough to adjust the carburetor to run a bit richer for the ethanol, but at that time, I could not do that, and couldn't afford to pay a professional to fiddle with carb settings (I actually looked into it).

I live at, and mostly drove my car at an elevation between 2966-3435ft.

I had people time and again tell me that there was no way I could run my engine on pump gas - which is a factor of why I have been following this discussion.

When I got my car in 1995 it was 0.030 over, had a tiny "A" cam (which I still have in a box by the way), the engine was topped off with a crappy smog era Chev carb, and was driven in an area with an elevation of 764ft.

__________________
1970 Formula 400
Carousel Red paint on Black standard interior
A no-engine, no-transmission, no-wheel option car.
Quite likely one of few '70 Muncie three speed Formula 400's left.


1991 Grand Am: 14.4 @ 93.7mph (DA corrected) (retired DD, stock appearing)
2009 Cobalt SS: 13.9 @ 103mph (current DD; makes something north of 300hp & 350ft/lbs)

Last edited by unruhjonny; 06-30-2022 at 10:03 AM.
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:59 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017