Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 01-29-2024, 04:39 AM
TRADERMIKE 2012 TRADERMIKE 2012 is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Coconut creek FL
Posts: 1,171
Default

We finally removed the Crank and Pistons from the 428 ci YK Block and as Lou and I deduced (using the stethoscope from Harbor Freight) that the noise was emanating from the # 7 Piston/cylinder Crank Pin "not" From the Piston slap, so confidently diagnosed by many Forum members, that was etched in stone.

This is why I take my time and gradually use the process of elimination to solve the various issues that I am experiencing at any time. The Piston slap prognosis was optional and was going to happen eventually, if not next.

The # 7 cyl Crank pin Journal was worn the most and is rough running my finger nail across the etched lines in the Journal. In addition, the Crank Pins need to be turned, if I decide to keep it. I would need matching Rod Bearings. The Crank itself also needs to be turned and new matching Bearings to suit.

The Piston Skirts were measured at the lowest point on the Skirt as well, measurements appear on the document that I am supplying with photos of the actual parts. You can look at the information in the upcoming attachments in order to let me know your thoughts.

Most of the upper compression rings were broken into 30%-70% two sections, can someone explain the reason for that? Originally the # 2 Piston had the groove in the Piston top orientated toward the front of the motor and all the remaining ones pointed toward the rear. Once we removed the group of Pistons and lined them up on a flat table, we could see that the Spurt holes were not lined up facing the intended lower Skirts/Wrist Pin or Cam area.

Both halves of the Rod and Cap were marked accordingly from number 1-8/Piston, where they join using a through bolt. I elected to orientate the Pistons, with the spurt holes up and let the Piston pointing groove fall where they may, for the time being. I noticed that the # 1 & 2 Piston grooves pointed forward and the other six faced toward the rear of the motor. You will see this in the photos soon. The engine builder that modified this Engine in 1968 had the Piston Grooves pointing toward the rear for race reasons according to my vast documented research, only to leave the Spurt holes pointing in the wrong direction, I recently learned.

However, the aftermarket Bearings don't have the necessary channels to flow the oil anyway, or so I just read in my new book. Perhaps that is the reason he built the Motor, the way it is today. I re-orientated the Piston/Rod with the Spirt hole up and pointing the oil to the opposing Pistons Wrist Pin and under Skirt to see what that would look like and I found out that is the way it is supposed to be. This means I will have to remove six of the wrist Pins and install the pistons the opposite way, that is the way to have the Thrust load as Pontiac meant it to be. Do you agree with my Theory?

Note: On these Rods, there is no bevel or camphor, one larger or smaller than the other that would clear the weights on the Crank, as was explained to me over the forum. The only difference we found was on one side of the Rod, on the lower half @ the webbing, is a raised portion, that resembles 1/16" diameter dowel x 3/16" high, cast in mark, perhaps for strength or maybe it depicts direction. For now, I base the orientation of the Rods by the Spurt holes only and the Pistons by the groove etched in the Piston edge top. I can only feel that since these Rods don't fit the description that was given to me, that maybe these are Forged ones? One could only hope! Let me know, they have an "H"- shape to them.

What if I want the Spurt holes to work as Pontiac had before, where am I going to get modern bearings to work like the old ones, are they special? Can I get away without the Bearing/Spurt hole Bearings that supply the oil to under the Piston Skirts and Wrist Pins, without this oiling system will the motor fail before its time? I have to wonder if that is the reason my existing Top compression rings cracked /Broke in the first place?

Butler sells a kit with Forged 455 ci Crank stroker, Forged Rods and Pistons. New Bearings, etc... From what I am reading in this new book that the price to turn and polish the existing Crank, Rods have to be sized, Crank turned, Pistons checked, Rods shot peened, nitride this and that, I might just start new. JMO

Lots to weigh out, this is a good start, as far as I can tell the Block is reuseable and just needs TLC.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Bore & Stroke Info.jpg
Views:	1356
Size:	73.3 KB
ID:	627399   Click image for larger version

Name:	Bottom View.jpg
Views:	1195
Size:	90.5 KB
ID:	627400   Click image for larger version

Name:	Crank View.jpg
Views:	1198
Size:	65.2 KB
ID:	627401   Click image for larger version

Name:	Piston to Deck Clearence.jpg
Views:	1155
Size:	52.5 KB
ID:	627404   Click image for larger version

Name:	Piston Skirt and Info.jpg
Views:	1209
Size:	79.8 KB
ID:	627403  


 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:22 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017