| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| View Poll Results: 1964 or 1965, which do you like best? | |||
| 1964 |
|
67 | 33.33% |
| 1965 |
|
134 | 66.67% |
| Voters: 201. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#38
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Was the 1964 a lighter car? I'm not sure but that makes a difference in handling and performance. Better heads, I'm not sure about that either. The 77 1965 heads were good for their period but of course, nearly every year had improvements till the early 1070's. Compression between 1964 and 1965 had to be close when physically measured, but I only know 1965 and 70cc seems to be is the number. M-20 with 3:90 ratio is a solid performance advantage IMHO. The 1964 colors had a bit more variety, I agree on the interior appointments too. Great dashboard and too. My father, who was 26 years old then, said that when the 1964 GTO came out the car was so beautiful that it stopped traffic. (N.Y. City) He sometimes likes to remind me of a lady who owned a "hair salon" and bought one new in burgundy, with spinner caps and a 4-speed was the ultimate showpiece. Sixty years later you can still sense the enthusiasm and excitement of when the 1964 hit the streets when he describes it.
__________________
[ |
|
|