| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I don't agree with the slower flow theories tho. The laws of heat transfer and physics don't support it. Q=mC(deltaT) is chiseled in stone. Take examples from the Pontiac: stepping up in cooling needs got you either bigger radiator with more surface area/rows, a higher capacity fan, smaller water pump pulley, or a combo of the three. The bigger surface area increases the "C" in the equation, while the last two increase the "m", or mass flow rate, of the equation. Keep in mind that there are multiple heat systems at play. There is the heat source (engine) and the heat sink (radiator). If you slow down flow to get more cooling across the radiator, then you also limiting the heat that can be removed from the engine. I haven't seen the Fast Monty episode you mentioned, but I will look for it so I can reconcile my understanding with his results. I am in the school of more flow is more better.
__________________
"...ridge reamer and ring compressor? Do they have tools like that?" |
|
|