#1  
Old 08-11-2005, 10:58 PM
74Grandville 74Grandville is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Plainville, CT
Posts: 1,847
Default 301 upgrades

I have a daily driver 79 firebird. I have been tuning the motor over the past couple months and it runs pretty good now for a 301 with 2.56 rear. I plan on changing to an 066 cam and a 4 barrel intake i've been working on. has anyone tried this? how does an 066 feel in a 301. I hope not to loose a lot of low end with the big gear, but hope to gain more power.

in the future I plan to put in a 200R4 with a 3.23 gear.

tell me what you think.

Jason

  #2  
Old 08-24-2005, 10:22 PM
74Grandville 74Grandville is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Plainville, CT
Posts: 1,847
Default

I plan to do the upgrade of the cam and intake this weekend. currently i'm getting an average of 19mpg before the upgrade. i'll let you all know what I think of the upgrade after i'm finished.

  #3  
Old 08-25-2005, 01:56 AM
heff heff is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bristol Va
Posts: 257
Default

what kind of intake are you working on? 066 is probably about as much cam as a stock 301 can handle. and it's that big of a cam. intake and exhaust ports on 301 heads are tiny little things, as are the valves. if it works out good for you, let me know. i've got another GP with a 301 i wanna do some work to.

  #4  
Old 08-25-2005, 05:04 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 21,711
Default

I would think porting the heck out of the intake and heads, a little more cam and more rear gears would be the best first stage. Those weird intake ports are a big restriction.

  #5  
Old 08-26-2005, 12:15 AM
74Grandville 74Grandville is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Plainville, CT
Posts: 1,847
Default

I am not an expert so this style of an intake might be worse then stock. I just did what I thought made sense as I do NOT have the correct spacer or carb for this intake. the secondaries on a normal q-jet seem to be bigger then this intake was made for. I have a 1inch spacer that I have sanded to give the correct placement for the carb. the second spacer is a 1/2 inch. I have not ported the intake as I didn't want to make the ports bigger then the head. I don't plan to take the heads off right now to do any work. this is just a fun project I came up with. it was cheap and that is all i can afford right now.

tell me what you think.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	8-25-05 001a.JPG
Views:	463
Size:	133.1 KB
ID:	25646   Click image for larger version

Name:	8-25-05 004a.JPG
Views:	490
Size:	142.0 KB
ID:	25643   Click image for larger version

Name:	8-25-05 005a.JPG
Views:	502
Size:	154.5 KB
ID:	25644   Click image for larger version

Name:	8-25-05 009a.JPG
Views:	468
Size:	49.6 KB
ID:	25645  


Last edited by 74Grandville; 08-26-2005 at 12:23 AM.
  #6  
Old 08-26-2005, 01:44 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 21,711
Default

I never understood the rationale of a single plane on a 301.

  #7  
Old 04-25-2006, 08:23 PM
80bird301 80bird301 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 11
Default

Hi I was wandering If any one knows how much hp or torque increases I could be getting from sum 2800 cam and 1.65 rockers?.(Maybe 20hp?) Im really not very educated in mechanics, so that just a guess. I would also be looking into stall converter maybe 2300, and 3.73 gears. Car already has 4brl and true duals. Was just wandering if any of you guys would have some estimated hp numbers from this setup. If I could get it over 200 horse I would be pleased. Stock 301 i beleive is only 140.

Thx in advance

  #8  
Old 04-26-2006, 08:59 AM
shotgun shotgun is offline
PY Staff -Tech
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hatfield Pa
Posts: 821
Default

Hey,that's my car!
The T1000 has a used 301 in it.Upgraded to a Edelbrock (carter) 600 cfm carb,milled a 4 hole spacer to the proper angle and installed it on a holley to Q jet adapter ,cam is a 067 with rhoades lifters,center dump logs,duals that merge before the rear to a single pipe,2500 stall,metric 200 trans,now has 3.36 rear.
It had a 3.70 which was way to much gear,had to shift the poor 301 at 6k or would run out of motor at 3/4 track.Hope to shift in the 5000/5500 range with the "new" rear.
I would not go over a 3.42 rear..
Keep in mind,my new stock 301 springs were only good to .425 lift,be careful with 1.65z.
Using some online claculators,my car has between 180-200hp at the flywheel based on Et and Mph.
With these engines,if you have a choice between "more or less",go with less compared to a normal Pontiac, less gear,less cam etc. etc.

__________________
"resurfacing Pa highways 2 long black strips at a time"

78 Olds Cutlass Drag car PONTIAC powered with 440 (destroked 455), th400, 12bolt with spool 4.10z
Best to date [email protected] mph at 3250#

79 Grand Prix, will be new home for the 440
Goal 9.75z@135mph at 2900#

83 Malibu Wagon UUV Crate 350, Custom T5, 8.5 with Auburn posi 3.73z
Making it the Ultimate Utility Vehicle
Go, tow and show (not so much show, yet)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:36 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017