#1  
Old 08-26-2005, 01:44 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 21,710
Default

I never understood the rationale of a single plane on a 301.

  #2  
Old 08-28-2005, 11:43 PM
74Grandville 74Grandville is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Plainville, CT
Posts: 1,847
Default

Well I didn't end up having time to change the cam in my firebird, but I did put the intake and carb on the car. supprisingly I did have a gain in power from 2600-4000. i'm happy with the upgrade. one thing I forgot, since I don't have the correct spacer for this intake I didn't have a place to hook up the PVC. I'll make a spot for it like the older intakes when I put the cam in the motor.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	untitled.JPG
Views:	452
Size:	35.7 KB
ID:	25845  

  #3  
Old 09-05-2005, 03:07 PM
UnNova73 UnNova73 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 31
Default

Jason:

I ported a set of turbo 301 heads, for a buddy of mine's N/A 301-powered 4-door '80 Bonneville. I must say: I have yet to see a set of heads with less counter-productive intake and exhaust port characteristics; nevermind the sizing of the intake and exhaust valves. I must have done something right, though, b/c even with a very mild Comp Cams grind and a VERY mild powertrain setup: The darned thing runs 14.4's; LOL.

  #4  
Old 09-06-2005, 12:41 AM
Formula77 Formula77 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ponoka AB.
Posts: 24
Send a message via Yahoo to Formula77
Default

The only real experince with 301s is in ripping them out of cars, (need a couple, I know where to find them pretty easy) it sounds like you have a pretty good handle on what you want to accomplish with your car, out of ceriousiy why are you sticking with the 301? In my oppinon it was the worst engine that pontiac ever put into a car, but once again, thats just me.

__________________
Pure Pontiac Excitment. There is no replacement for Displacement.
  #5  
Old 09-07-2005, 10:31 PM
74Grandville 74Grandville is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Plainville, CT
Posts: 1,847
Default

it what I have, and it's running well (53,000 miles). when I have more time and money I may build a 400 for it. I also may buy a stock 72 455 for it a friend has.

  #6  
Old 09-12-2005, 12:46 AM
74Grandville 74Grandville is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Plainville, CT
Posts: 1,847
Default

well I put the 066 cam in this weekend. i've decided 1.5 days is not long enough to do a cam swap. it wasn't fun rushing around. as for the performance. i'm sorry to say I wish I went bigger. maybe a summit 2800 would have been better. it does rev quicker and is more responsive. I'd say a little more power through out, but most of the gain was from 3000+

i'd say my next step is the exhaust and rear end. I have a 3.08 posi I may put in.

  #7  
Old 03-28-2006, 12:47 PM
74Grandville 74Grandville is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Plainville, CT
Posts: 1,847
Default update 3/28/06

I'm still driving my firebird with 301 and i'm much happier now( 64,000 miles). I wanted to update everyone since this motor is forgotten by most. I found that I had an issue with my distributor and my valves were tighten down to much with the stock nutz. i've change my mind on the 066. I think it was a good choice for this setup. maybe an even better choice would have been a small XE comp cam to build compression since the 301 is 7.5:1.

i've done some transmisson upgrades that have seem to really help things. I changed the stall from the stock 1500 to 2100 with a B&M converter. i've also put a shift kit in and changed the governer to shift at 5,000 instead of 4,000. The motor runs pretty strong now begging me for 3.42 gears.

my car loves the highway, it still very slow from a start, but has good power from 2500-5000. I spend my time mashing the pedal at 35mph. first gear shifts around 65 and second is around 100.

I plan to put in the 3.42 gears in a couple months.

  #8  
Old 04-09-2006, 10:16 AM
Brian Baker's Avatar
Brian Baker Brian Baker is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Glen Burnie, MD USA
Posts: 17,184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UnNova73
Jason:

I ported a set of turbo 301 heads, for a buddy of mine's N/A 301-powered 4-door '80 Bonneville. I must say: I have yet to see a set of heads with less counter-productive intake and exhaust port characteristics; nevermind the sizing of the intake and exhaust valves. I must have done something right, though, b/c even with a very mild Comp Cams grind and a VERY mild powertrain setup: The darned thing runs 14.4's; LOL.
Can you provide more specific details about the car and the whole combo? We've got a 301 discussion going on over at the CP board and I'm looking for all data on practical applications of the 301 that work.

__________________
Just a blind squirrel looking for a nut.
  #9  
Old 04-22-2006, 12:44 AM
lawbreaker2's Avatar
lawbreaker2 lawbreaker2 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: OH
Posts: 281
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Baker
Can you provide more specific details about the car and the whole combo? We've got a 301 discussion going on over at the CP board and I'm looking for all data on practical applications of the 301 that work.


What are the cp boards????? can you post a link

  #10  
Old 05-22-2006, 07:57 PM
bastard's Avatar
bastard bastard is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 648
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skip Fix
I never understood the rationale of a single plane on a 301.
The intake ports on the head are siamesed so there are only 4 intake runners. There really isn't any reason for a dual plane with those heads. I never understood the reason they made such oddball heads in the first place. They could have put some more weight on them and made the ports bigger.
The 301 has an apetite for timing chains. The best recommendation I've heard is to change the timing chain and gears at 50,000 miles. I had one that went 89,000 miles before it jumped time. That's how I found out. Don't let one go anywhere near that long or you're just begging for trouble.

  #11  
Old 05-23-2006, 09:07 AM
74Grandville 74Grandville is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Plainville, CT
Posts: 1,847
Default

I noticed the chain is just thinner then a normal chain. maybe run a normal pontiac chain instead of a 301 chain. when I tore mine down for a cam swap I notice a real lot of chain slack with only 43,000.

  #12  
Old 05-25-2006, 09:45 AM
Mr. T/A's Avatar
Mr. T/A Mr. T/A is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 136
Default 301 performance

Not trying to hyjack the post but I have a 301 4brl intake, spacer and carb from an 80 Formula that I would like to quit kicking around the garage. Any offers?

__________________
Crusin in the Great White North!
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:31 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017