#1  
Old 02-26-2007, 05:48 PM
Steve C. Steve C. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Liberty Hill, Tx. (Austin)
Posts: 10,929
Default

Ok between the two, and setting aside the minimal differance in air flow.

One set-up with a little deeper chamber and flat top piston, with no dish and only valve reliefs, for 10.5 compression. And the second with a little shallower chamber and a piston with a 20cc dish for the same 10.5 compression.

Is there any flame front and/or burn pattern issues with the deeper 20cc dished piston compared to the flat top piston ?

I was told by a friend about a discussion years ago with Jim Butler and at the time Jim favored a flat top. This came during a discussion about milling out a dish on a TRW piston to make them pump gas friendly with a small chamber iron head.

  #2  
Old 02-26-2007, 07:12 PM
b-man's Avatar
b-man b-man is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sunny So Cal
Posts: 17,617
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve C.
Ok between the two, and setting aside the minimal differance in air flow.

One set-up with a little deeper chamber and flat top piston, with no dish and only valve reliefs, for 10.5 compression. And the second with a little shallower chamber and a piston with a 20cc dish for the same 10.5 compression.

Is there any flame front and/or burn pattern issues with the deeper 20cc dished piston compared to the flat top piston ?

I was told by a friend about a discussion years ago with Jim Butler and at the time Jim favored a flat top. This came during a discussion about milling out a dish on a TRW piston to make them pump gas friendly with a small chamber iron head.
From what I've read, putting as much of the combustion chamber as you can in the piston itself is beneficial.

Aren't some of the best engine builders using heads with a tiny or even close to no combustion chamber along with a properly shaped dish in the piston these days?

I know this is the street forum, but wouldn't it be a good idea to mimic this type of build on a street engine if the additional cost for a properly dished piston is somewhat minimal in comparison to the rest of the build? That's all I'm getting at.

__________________
1964 Tempest Coupe LS3/4L70E/3.42
1964 Le Mans Convertible 421 HO/TH350/3.08
2002 WS6 Convertible LS1/4L60E/3.23
1966 VW Type 2 Single Cab Pickup 140hp 2276
1956 VW Type 2 Panel Van 36hp 1200
1957 VW Type 1 Beetle 180hp 2276
  #3  
Old 02-26-2007, 07:38 PM
Steve C. Steve C. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Liberty Hill, Tx. (Austin)
Posts: 10,929
Default

I don't disagree. I know little on the subject and putting forth conversation to get opinions. My 505 build is using a custom 27cc reverse dome piston with 72cc Edelbrock castings for about 10.2-10.3 compression. They are a JE piston very similar to the one Andy Mitchel used in his 505 Road Warrior build in the Dec 2005 Hot Rod on pg 128.


Last edited by Steve C.; 02-26-2007 at 07:46 PM.
  #4  
Old 02-26-2007, 08:20 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 21,711
Default

Gosh no one has even brought up the old too big race head argument!

I want to think my Ross dish were around $550.

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:40 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017