#1  
Old 08-21-2007, 12:11 PM
n2ogpsj462's Avatar
n2ogpsj462 n2ogpsj462 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ambler, PA
Posts: 943
Default

whats wrong with the earlier qjets? i have the orig from my 71 455 thinking it was "good" but i guess not? what would be needed for the early ones and why are they inferior? is it just the cfm? also 79transam79 if jeff is that close to you it is a no brainer to use him plus his work is top notch. i sure wish he was the close to me it would have made this summer alot easier.

__________________
71 grand prix SJ 4280# 462 new for 2008 -
8.7:1 , 98cc 6Xs 246/209, 342 12bolt , BW S475 turbo JGS 50mm WG 56mm BOV. 600hp the easy way!
  #2  
Old 08-21-2007, 01:24 PM
shaker455's Avatar
shaker455 shaker455 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NH
Posts: 4,482
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by n2ogpsj462
whats wrong with the earlier qjets? i have the orig from my 71 455 thinking it was "good" but i guess not? what would be needed for the early ones and why are they inferior? is it just the cfm?
Scott,
There's nothing wrong with the eariler Qjets, I own quite a few...the later ones had more adjustability and have features like APT and a slightly larger primary (800 CFM) for example.

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:47 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017