#1  
Old 04-06-2009, 08:32 AM
Cliff R's Avatar
Cliff R Cliff R is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mount Vernon, Ohio 43050
Posts: 18,153
Default

Not a good choice at 7 something to 1 static compression ratio. I like to see closer to 10 to 1 SCR with those cams. The Comp version is NOT a "modified" version with short seat to seat timing, less overlap, etc. It is very close to the original RAIV cam, 308/320, 230/240, 114LSA.....Cliff

__________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can read this in English, thank a Veteran!
https://cliffshighperformance.com/
73 Ventura, SOLD 455, 3740lbs, 11.30's at 120mph, 1977 Pontiac Q-jet, HO intake, HEI, 10" converter, 3.42 gears, DOT's, 7.20's at 96mph and still WAY under the roll bar rule. Best ET to date 7.18 at 97MPH (1/8th mile),
  #2  
Old 04-06-2009, 08:36 AM
cdb cdb is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Norwalk CT
Posts: 73
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff R View Post
Not a good choice at 7 something to 1 static compression ratio. I like to see closer to 10 to 1 SCR with those cams. The Comp version is NOT a "modified" version with short seat to seat timing, less overlap, etc. It is very close to the original RAIV cam, 308/320, 230/240, 114LSA.....Cliff
Thats exactly what I was afraid of. Any sensible choice for my application that I can consider ?

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:42 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017