| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
A leakdown test will tell you a lot more than a compression test and you can get the tester for well under $100.
A compression test will tell you how much pressure the piston it building. The leakdown test tells you how much compression the cylinder is holding...and if it's not holding it, where it's going...Out the exhaust valve, the intake valve, past the rings, to an adjacent cylinder or into the water jacket. I fought the stinky exhaust problem for several years. An acrid, eye watering smell that I could smell on my clothes later. After four used carbs with identical results I came to the same conclusion as PontGuy...There's something wrong and it's not the carb. I did a Leakdown test and found I had some fairly significant blowby into the crankcase. My engine is in the shop now. My machinist not only found that I needed valve guides but the last shop that worked on the engine installed 30 over pistons and the cylinders were bored 40 over. Surprisingly, the engine ran very well and if not for the fuel smell, I would have just run it like it was. Not saying you have that problem but just to give you more evididence that it could be internal to the engine.
__________________
Greg Reid Palmetto, Georgia Last edited by Greg Reid; 10-19-2009 at 07:36 AM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm taking the day off today- working hard to get my engine ready to start so living/breathing old Pontiacs right now. Installed my new Pypes x-over exhaust system over the weekend. What a PITA. I'm getting too old to be crawling under and back out of a car a couple hundred times in two days!
Yeah at the back of my mind there is a distinct possibility that something bad has happened to this engine but hoping not. I've been thinking wiped cam lobes or sunk/burned valves, but haven't considered blow-by since there aren't that many miles since the bottom end build. The compression test numbers made me feel better, but they certainly haven't eliminated the possibility. And we don't have numbers for two of the cylinders. Mike more questions- The bottom end of the engine was rebuilt quite a while back but has very low miles on it, way less than 50,000, right? Does it runs smooth, with no obvious miss or stumbles? With the Rhodes lifters the valvetrain should be a bit noisy- is it? Has the smell been there from the beginning, ever since the engine was installed? If you run it up without the breather you don't see a plume of oily air coming out of the vent tube from the valve cover, do you? Walt
__________________
1969 Lemans vert, matador red, 462 CI, 3.07 12-bolt posi 1974 455 TA, admiralty blue/red interior HPP "cover car" - sold "The best way to show a car is to drive it" |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Guys, thanks for the help. Here is the best I can answer right now:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
One thing I didn't mention is that you do need a compressor. Even a small one would probably work ok. Quote:
Plus, the engine ran strong. No problem laying rubber from a slow roll. No noticeable miss and decent vacuum. With the leakdown tester, I could clearly hear air coming out of the carb. Which reminds me...Someone earlier mentioned oil vapors coming out of the valve cover tube. Looking back, I had a significant amount of that occuring but because of the raw fuel smelling exhaust, I couldn't get away from thinking it was a carb problem. I just didn't think they were related. I guess the reality is, the fumes are probably a mixture of oil and gas. I definitely had a light colored smoke at the exhaust, not the typical black smoke indicating a rich condition. All these things I ignored because I never recall smelling that acrid raw fuel smell with a car before that was simply burning oil
__________________
Greg Reid Palmetto, Georgia Last edited by Greg Reid; 10-20-2009 at 05:32 AM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
A compression tester is a good tool to get an idea what the valvetrain is doing but I don't think it is good for determining ring fit problems. The problem is that when the engine is running it develops pressures that are much, much higher than just the cranking compression, and this can blow by the rings even if the cranking compression looks OK. I never tried a leakdown tester, but it sounds like that would work.
Blow-by is pretty obvious, though, because the combustion gases go right into the crankcase and the only way out is the PCV valve, vents, etc. So you will get a plume of oily air from these, especially under load. In the early days I a had a bunch of old worn out cars that did this. I had a 65 Corvair that would literally blow the dipstick out of the tube (and yes it was very stinky!) If the compression rings don't fit good but the oil control rings are OK then you can actually have a car with excessive blow-by that runs well and doesn't use much oil. But usually you will see at least some oil usage as well. Walt
__________________
1969 Lemans vert, matador red, 462 CI, 3.07 12-bolt posi 1974 455 TA, admiralty blue/red interior HPP "cover car" - sold "The best way to show a car is to drive it" Last edited by PontGuy; 10-20-2009 at 06:58 AM. Reason: correction |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|