| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
No EUN or 20 preceding the NXXXXXX. The N is not lined up with the rest of the VIN. The VIN font doesn't look the same as others I have seen. I'm no expert, but the block has grooves in it where the VIN is stamped. I have seen this on another original VIN stampings. Seems that would be gone and the metal smooth if it's restamped. That would indicate that maybe it isn't a restamp but maybe a fresh stamp on a bare block aquired from a dealer as a SR block. Just guessing. But it is a pretty early date code for a SR block isn't it? And that would still mean it was misrepresented in the sale. If the factory didn't stamp it then it isn't #'s matching, period.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
PW tranny is for a GP.
The block looks like it might have been ground on by the partial VIN. It also looks like the stampings are too big for what they normally are.
__________________
John Wallace - johnta1 Pontiac Power RULES !!! www.wallaceracing.com Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever! W.E.C moment "Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts." "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yep, here is the link to the ebay listing. Very stock, very original, numbers matching engine and trans...shoot me! I'm looking for something definitive to rule this block in or out. I speak with an attorney on Monday http://www.collectorcarpricetracker....0373566237.pdf |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|