[mechanic17]

Bruce, you quoted the LSA comment from the "debate" section. That HAS been hotly contended here, and I'm only trying to provide a summation, not add a new opinion in this post. Do you mean scratch it from the top section (section I)?

Or would you prefer to reword either yourself (I'll edit it in)?

[BruceWilkie]

Originally Posted by mechanic17

Bruce, you quoted the LSA comment from the "debate" section. That HAS been hotly contended here, and I'm only trying to provide a summation, not add a new opinion in this post. Do you mean scratch it from the top section (section I)?

Or would you prefer to reword either yourself (I'll edit it in)?

Section 1 dynamic compression should just say intake closing point Not LSA.

OK to reference LSA ICL and advertised numbers but intake closed seat time would be more meaningful/conveniant for honest compression comparison.

Not many have ever posted results of simply retarding their cam timing say 2 degrees to trim a bit of excess cylinder pressure. More often than not the whole cam gets swapped. instead. You do see posts where cams have been advanced beyond spec to compensate for wrong cam choice(too big) in the 1st place.