| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| THE LOBBY A gathering place. Introductions, sports, showin' off your ride, birthday-anniversary-milestone, achievements, family oriented humor. |
| Reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Back around 1986/87 Pontiac had a styling exercise using a 2 door Grand Am, with '65 style patterns in the seats and door panels, and a "Super Duty" Iron Duke 4 cylinder engine
. Thank goodness Pontiac had enough respect for the GTO nameplate at that time to not produce that thing. Also too bad that the Grand Prix 2+2 didn't have an engine with some real power when they produced that. If weak kneed management hadn't thrown out all the V8 tooling in 1981, they could have produced a port injected 301 turbo with a reinforced block that would have really did the 2+2 justice. And would have made a potential muscle car out of the regular "formal" roofline Grand Prix, along the lines of what Buick did with the Regal T type and GN.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'm proud that Pontiac refused to play the 4 or 6 cylinder game with the GTO, like Ford and Chrysler have done with their heralded "names". A GTO always meant at 5.7L or larger V8 engine, 2 doors and a manual transmission option. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() I know that I had already purchased my '64 (purchased in June 1992), but not driven it (first drive Oct 1994) when I read about it in a then current magazine. I definitely remember it had the Iron Duke and it was a stylized Grand Am. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|