#1  
Old 12-21-2011, 12:38 AM
screamingchief's Avatar
screamingchief screamingchief is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: S.E. Wisconsin
Posts: 12,788
Default

Well,,,the Crower #60310 solid is ever so slightly "bigger" than the XE274 cam is...

Though if it were me,for a healthy solid cammed 455 cid combo,I'd go with the Crower #60311 solid cam @ the minimum.

The Crower #60310 solid is a much better cam for a strong 400 cid combo.

I personaly dont subscribe to that old add 8° to 10° of duration @ .050" POV,IMHO it's way too vague,and there's just too many things that it wont account for,me I prefer to look @ the actual valve events of both given cams to get an idea how they compare.

That's especially true when things like the LSA and installed centerlines are changed between the two given cams.

Ask me,more often than not,it's gonna take something like an additional 15° to 20° (@ .050") to make equal to -or- more power than a "comparable" hydraulic cam combo will make.

That is especially true with some specific solid lobes that have less seat timing.

FWIW

Bret P.

__________________
This space for rent...

In the meantime,check out the cars HERE.

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:25 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017