| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
so this begs the question..are there any differences in 455 blocks from 70 to 76? discounting the ram air blocks and four bolt mains in some....
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
NEW 500813 casting ID. Best to stay with 485428 for ANY serious HP builds.
__________________
![]() Eye Candy......garage band? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUPcHxHRx3s Go full screen & turn it UP! |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
TooMany - I didn't think the undercut cap rails were present on the 455 blocks for those years...you got any pics? It is pretty dramatic w/ the 400 blocks as far as the missing meat in that area.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The casting # wasn't changed for NO reason. Anybody done a weight comparison?
__________________
![]() Eye Candy......garage band? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUPcHxHRx3s Go full screen & turn it UP! |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll post a pic of a 76WX block - way more meat than was around the mains of the 557. Heck, the 557 is so poorly cast under the main caps that you can't add standard four bolt main caps - they'd drill through. I'll post a pic.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Maybe us 500557 owners can copy a page from the hi-po 403 Olds owners and run a halo girdle and a main cap brace that ties into the oil pan rail. It would be cool if we could run 4.21" and 4.25" stoker kits w/ no fear of block breakage as well.
Geno http://www.jsmachineoldsmobile.com/images/full.JPG |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I feel that the 375 HP limit mentioned in a couple posts is reasonable for a "557" block. Remember that's a 100% safety margin for the original design parameters give or take a few HP. These were designed for 185 HP and 4500 RPM's. So likely good for the 375 HP level and 5000 RPM's for an occasional blast on the street. Unless doing a numbers matching restoration, I would bypass that inferior casting for the much better ones still out there. JMO.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I don't really think so. Certainly a 76 455 doesn't have the same weakness issue as that 76 557 block. Maybe older castings had more nickle?? - not sure that applies to the 455 blocks. The 76 455 blocks were not drilled for four-bolt mains. Some folks think that may make them stronger as less of the meat has been removed around the crank for the four bolt caps. A studded two-bolt cap is plenty strong - especially if the block has not been drilled for four bolt caps. If you "do" want to strengthen one of those 455 blocks, then you should only use splayed four bolt caps as a non-splayed four bolt cap motor may actually be weaker than a studded two bolt main motor for the reason above. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|