| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
what were the original design/build specifications for horsepower? if turbo headers were commissioned obviously the NA hp was just the tip of the iceberg as far as power potential? No doubt the prior reputations of all parties involved was stellar, now it appears there is a lot of mud in the waters. this was/is a high end, money is no object build. If Ed was told he needed a titanium balancer bolt, from tony, lynn or anyone else consulted in this build he would have bought it. If the engine 'builder'(s) missed their price point at quote time its on them. the customer should get what he paid for. Ed should/could have an 1100 hp NA street motor at this price level.
__________________
1968 firebird cameo white on red 400 4 speed 1969 carousel red firebird 455, richmond 5 speed 1964 gto pump gas, 505 IA2 EHeads, EFI, 92 mm turbo ice cream getter in process now.... 1970 lemans hardtop, gto clone Atoll Blue 1972 Maverick powered by 2004 gto ls1 and t56 6 speed, 8.8, fox strut front end, wifes car |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
A Pipemax evaluation for your 535 cubic inch engine using 9.1 compression ratio and 5800 RPM for peak power says average 660 Horsepower would be flowing between 310 CFM and 330 CFM through the intake tract related to normal flow bench test. I think you previously mentioned your ported heads peaked at 388 flowbench CFM or so. I would be VERY curious to see what your intake and head would flow test peak when bolted together..(loss should not be too severe) You payed good money for porting of both cylinder heads and intake. Quote:
Now for a little word on engine "piston demand". Ideally for good efficiency and power at RPM you hope to have an intake tract that does a good job at keeping up with the engine flow (CFM) demand at given RPM. By far most applications do fall short of keeping up, but maybe aim to be within 95 percent, and certainly within 90 percent of demand. I've attached an image below with estimated peak piston demand as it would translate on a flowbench vs RPMs. You can see a naturally aspirated engine with 535 cubes displacement gets very hungry with flow demand (CFM) very quickly as RPMs increase. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
One more addition to my post above.
The 515 Big Chevy posted here: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/....php?p=4704122 makes 2000 Horsepower race tune, 1000 Horsepower street de-tune. I see a few parallels beginning with engine size and power goal to Ed's. The Cam in the Chevy was 252 intake dur @ .50 256 exhaust dur @ .050 .715 lift with 115 LSA The Cylinder Head was Brodix Big Duke PB1802 - intake port 456cc flowbench numbers attached image |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|