#1  
Old 11-24-2012, 10:52 PM
60man's Avatar
60man 60man is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 8,430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Vaught View Post
the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, in studies aimed at increasing the power from aircraft piston engines, came to the following conclusion: “The data indicated that water was a very effective internal coolant, permitting large increases in engine power as limited by either knock or by cylinder temperatures.”

Engine power production, referred to as brake mean effective pressure (BMEP), is measured by taking the average effective pressure of the cylinders as they progress through intake, compression, ignition, and exhaust strokes. Added power comes as a result of greater pressure, but a higher temperature inside the cylinder accompanies greater pressure. These higher temperatures can lead to detonation, referred to as engine knock, or pre-ignition, both of which are cases where the fuel-air mixture burns in an undesirable manner and can be destructive to an engine. To combat knock and pre-ignition as power increases, a richer air-to-fuel ratio is normally required. If the addition of extra fuel doesn’t provide enough knock protection, then a higher-octane fuel, which is more resistant to knock and pre-ignition, may be used. However, once the knock limit of a higher-octane fuel is reached, can anything be done? This is where a water injection system presents an appealing option.

The issue may be that cooling the charge may not be enough vs the higher octane fuel.

Tom Vaught
In short ......guess I should go with E85.
I have some gas stations within 10-15 miles of my home.

__________________


ECM member.
2008 Outlaw Pontiac Drag Series Champion
MANDRA
Do it now fool! Life is short.

69 Grand Prix/3163lbs / IAII 535 w/ Tiger heads by Gaydosh....9.35@ 144 so far.. through mufflers. 1.26 60'.
Going back to track with pump gas engine....
My 60 Ventura retired to street/strip duty..
  #2  
Old 11-24-2012, 11:02 PM
T Syron's Avatar
T Syron T Syron is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Plainfield, IL.
Posts: 1,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 60man View Post
In short ......guess I should go with E85.
I have some gas stations within 10-15 miles of my home.
Troy,
I have been told that you can't trust the percentage of ethanol from the pumps. It's supposed to be all over the place. Maybe check into it before you make your decision.

Good luck,
Tom Syron

  #3  
Old 11-24-2012, 11:08 PM
T Syron's Avatar
T Syron T Syron is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Plainfield, IL.
Posts: 1,221
Default

From VP race fuel website.


NEW! C85™
If you’re committed to using E85 type fuels, C85 is by far your best choice. Conventional E85 fuels are notoriously inconsistent, requiring up to a two-jet swing in tuning from one batch of E85 to the next. By contrast, C85 is blended with a consistent proportion of ethanol and every other component in every drum. In addition to taking all the guesswork out of tuning, C85 makes up to 4% more power and torque than conventional E85. With higher quality pure components, C85 is superior to E85 in terms of cooling effect, resistance to detonation and even includes corrosion inhibitors to fight the issues presented by ethanol. C85 works well in drag racing, oval track, off road and virtually any other automotive application, in particular forced induction applications due to its lower vapor pressure. Tests of C85 indicate most applications will require richening up by 1 jet size, or 2-3% over current jetting. Note that for racers unwilling to invest in the new carb and expensive fuel system upgrade required for E85, VP’s MS109, VP113 and Q16 continue to be the best race gas alternatives for the money.


Tom Syron

  #4  
Old 11-25-2012, 01:04 AM
60man's Avatar
60man 60man is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 8,430
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T Syron View Post
Troy,
I have been told that you can't trust the percentage of ethanol from the pumps. It's supposed to be all over the place. Maybe check into it before you make your decision.

Good luck,
Tom Syron
Yep..I know. Most of the E85 Guru's have that covered to.. You can get a test kit and just change your tune to compensate for variences... More jet,add some race fuel, or both...
As far as that goes....can you trust Race Fuel octane ???

The fuel suppliers raise price of E85 right up to Race fuel prices ..

Sorry but $11.00 a gallon sux..

__________________


ECM member.
2008 Outlaw Pontiac Drag Series Champion
MANDRA
Do it now fool! Life is short.

69 Grand Prix/3163lbs / IAII 535 w/ Tiger heads by Gaydosh....9.35@ 144 so far.. through mufflers. 1.26 60'.
Going back to track with pump gas engine....
My 60 Ventura retired to street/strip duty..
  #5  
Old 11-25-2012, 11:06 AM
Goat-Racer's Avatar
Goat-Racer Goat-Racer is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lompoc, CA
Posts: 716
Default

I installed a Snow dual nozzle kit on my 421 just before Drag Week back in '06. The new heads (my current ones) had just gone on the motor and the compression ratio was now 11.4:1. The plan was to run the mid West's finest 93 octane pump gas and the WM injection. We started the first day and ended up a few tenths behind the class leader. In an act of despiration, I turned off the WM and went a tenth faster. It just turned out that the combo was safe enough to not need the extra protection, and I may have been spraying too much mixture to boot, but there is only so much real estate inside of the intake manifold. That and the fact that water doesn't burn. Mine just didn't need it or benefit from it.
Your higher CR may like it over what I had.

End of Drag Week story: front shock and rear tire pressure tuning gained us another few tenths and eventually gave us the small block NA class win!

__________________
Brian Rock

'65 GTO - Pump gas 496" IA2 w/ High Ports, 200-4R trans, 3.73 gears, 275 Hoosier radials, and 3925 lbs.
9.88 @ 134 N/A on Cali 91 octane.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJEIY5OJ68g
  #6  
Old 11-25-2012, 12:15 PM
60man's Avatar
60man 60man is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 8,430
Default

Thanks for your input Brian. I'm just testing the waters(no pun) at the moment.
There are a LOT of racers who run & like the E85. Just seeing if I have other options..
I have a lot of space in my Gutsram intake ..

__________________


ECM member.
2008 Outlaw Pontiac Drag Series Champion
MANDRA
Do it now fool! Life is short.

69 Grand Prix/3163lbs / IAII 535 w/ Tiger heads by Gaydosh....9.35@ 144 so far.. through mufflers. 1.26 60'.
Going back to track with pump gas engine....
My 60 Ventura retired to street/strip duty..
  #7  
Old 11-25-2012, 02:30 PM
455firebird1969's Avatar
455firebird1969 455firebird1969 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 2,650
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 60man View Post
There are a LOT of racers who run & like the E85.
Troy, you hit the nail on the head. Something I don't understand is, anytime E85 is discussed on this forum, negative comments seem to come from folks not running it. This comment is not directed at any particular individual, it is intended as a general statement on this topic, not a deliberate jab. If there is someone burning pump E85 (ethanol), who has negative results based on experience, I would like to hear it. I really don't care whether or not, you or anyone else, switches to ethanol, it's a personal choice.

I have run pump E85 (ethanol) for three years. My 850DP looks like new inside, after three years, of ethanal use. I have filled my drum 8 times in the last three years. The first drum was 85%, the second drum was 74%, so I re-jetted for 74%. The third drum I got was 94%, so I added regular unleaded to get down to 74%. I ran 74% all that year, and the second year, because my engine liked that tune. I went back to 85% for the third year. I now know what jets to use for 74% or 85%. When filling my drum I have received 85% or higher every time except that one time I got 74%. If you fill a drum and get a different mix and have to re-jet, that drum will last several months, so it's not like you are re-jetting every weekend. I have spent approximately $1700 for race fuel in the last three years. Had I used race gas I would have spent about $2700. The 850DP cost $600 new, and the SS filter I installed was about $60. Additionally, my engine makes more power and runs cooler when I burn ethanol, compared to 110 octane race gas.

My only regret is my car is no longer using a Q-jet.

__________________
1969 Firebird, Tx3-455/468 machined by CVMS
E-heads by Dave Wilcox/Comp Cams 300B-6 flat solid
850DP on E-85 by Eric Niefert/T2 1" plastic spacer
T-400/PTC 4000/390's/30x9 Hoosier radial slicks,#3400
1.38 60' 6.32 @ 108 MPH at Northeast Dragway NC 5/23/15 (9th pass on new engine)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ePCu2v...ature=youtu.be

1.37 60' 6.26 @ 109 half track, 9.86 @ 136 1/4 mile, #3350 11/26/16 at Richmond Dragway (125th pass on new engine)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:02 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017