| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Yes, all three cars you list above have different identities to their brethren, but, those identities are based on their visual impact, ie, their appearance package, which the Judge does have. The difference lies in the content of the rest of their special packages.
__________________
1968 Firebird 400HO convertible 1971 Trans Am 4-speed, white/blue Last edited by 68bird400HO; 12-13-2012 at 04:00 PM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Diego; 12-13-2012 at 06:01 PM. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Diego For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
[QUOTE=Diego;4804267]If there was not Judge, there likely wouldn't be a GSX. I think the actual standard content is irrelevant - I think both cars rely on image more than anything else.[Quote]
And I can agree that a Judge is definitely an iconic car. I am just being objective about the fact that it is more or less an appearance package option for a GTO. I think your frustration with the Olds boys had to do with each side arguing two different points. The debate over what was the Judge package, objectively, and was it iconic are two completely different discussions. I can also agree that it may have been the car that ignited the specialty car package craze for those few years unless you want to give any credit to the 68 Hurst Olds.
__________________
1968 Firebird 400HO convertible 1971 Trans Am 4-speed, white/blue |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I respect everyones opinions and views on that type subject. However to remind folks - the first 2000 initial Pre-Built Judges in 69 ALL had righteous performance appearance handling steering braking options... and hood tachs with gauges - take it or leave it was the deal until after mid February. Similar to 2nd Gen TA's marketing. And at that time of release - it was unknown if they would even sell them all. Much less produce more. The only thing missing on those were IV engines. Which weren't released yet anyway. Otherwise they were full ticket performance package. I don't think nearly as many would have been sold if that content and color had remained a requisite. Pontiac probably had that same notion. Its release and initial offering was pretty full tilt. Those cars set the stage. Gets too involved to split all the hairs after that. Turning the Judge into an "adjustable content" helped more sell. Like the one that Steve posted. That buyer might not have been able or willing to make it happen for almost $4300 on a Pattern Car. But for $3600 he was driving a new Carousel Red Judge with WS Ram Air. For $3250 he would have gotten something more similar to this Limelight GTO with a WT and dual snorkel breather. He got more performance and more appearance. More 1st and early 2nd Gen TA's would have likely been sold if their content had more adjustability as well. Its all in how each person chooses to view it. i respect that. But personally would categorize them right with most all the others mentioned. with Hurst/Olds being a possible exception. You could option a GTO to have everything of a Judge except the appearance features. You could option a Formula to have everything of a TA except appearance. But i wouldn't ask a TA to step down because of that. They just evolved in different ways. The Judge downscaled a little, the TA upscaled a little. Last edited by Baron Von Zeppelin; 12-13-2012 at 07:24 PM. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Baron Von Zeppelin For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
1 of the Original First 2000 Judges
(excluding tranny choice and/or AC) 99.x % either got the exact equipment as this - or they got no judge at all - in the onset |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Baron Von Zeppelin For This Useful Post: | ||
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|