#1  
Old 08-06-2013, 03:33 PM
buddy in texas buddy in texas is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 40
Default What are the pros and cons of Enviro-Safe refrigerants?

Can anybody give me the pros and cons of Enviro-Safe ES-12a refrigerant. It replaces R12 and 134a as well as others. The last articles/comments on this forum are 8-9 years old and are quite negative. So, I'm looking for some current updates or anyone that has first hand experience using this product. One can google search "enviro-safe refrigerant" or look at the website: http://autorefrigerants.com/co00033.htm I'm leaning strongly to giving this stuff a try.

  #2  
Old 08-08-2013, 08:17 PM
buddy in texas buddy in texas is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 40
Default

I can't believe nobody on this forum can give any input about Enviro-Safe. I have continued my research and found much more positive information. About the only negative I've found it that it is flammable. So what? Every vehicle is toting around 12-40 gallons of gasoline, propane, lpg, or E85 that is also much more flammable. Does anyone really care about 18 oz. or less of refrigerant catching fire? Come on. It has much better cooling properties than R-12 or 134a, has 40-70% less hp drag on the compressor under load, has larger molecules for less chance of leaks, does not have to have vacuum pulled on system (mfr recommends to release vacuum after checking for leaks) A local (Houston, Tx) vintage air dealer who has been installing aftermarket a/c systems for years told me that is all he has been using for years with great success. I'm just passing along the positive information I learned over the past couple of days about Enviro-Safe refrigerant.

  #3  
Old 08-09-2013, 03:35 AM
Mister Pontiac's Avatar
Mister Pontiac Mister Pontiac is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: New River, AZ
Posts: 1,061
Default

Hmmm... Very interesting. I'll be curious as to your results after install. I don't have any experience with it. I'm still using R-12 myself, so I'm hoping you have good news to report too! Enviro friendly and (I assume) cheaper, plus cools as well in an original R-12 system? That seems like a tall order, but I'm all ears... Please report back with your results!

__________________
Eric Mitten

'74 Bonneville 4dr Sedan (455/TH400/2.93 open)
'72 LeMans GT (455/M-13/3.23 [8.5"] posi)
'71 GTO Hardtop (400/TH400/3.07 12 bolt posi)
‘71 GTO Convertible (455HO/TH400/3.23 posi)
'67 GTO Coupe (455/ST-10/2.93 posi)

Deuteronomy 8:3
  #4  
Old 08-09-2013, 07:15 AM
Keith Seymore's Avatar
Keith Seymore Keith Seymore is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Motor City
Posts: 8,509
Default

Some discussion here:

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=734055

The focus of that thread was something called RedTek.

How does the Enviro Safe compare? http://www.redtek.com/products.html

I haven't seen either of these products on shelves here locally. Is it something you have to special order? In Bulk?

K

__________________
'63 LeMans Convertible
'63 Grand Prix
'65 GTO - original, unrestored, Dad was original owner, 5000 original mile Royal Pontiac factory racer
'74 Chevelle - original owner, 9.56 @ 139 mph besthttp://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/
My Pontiac Story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524
"Intro from an old Assembly Plant Guy":http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926
  #5  
Old 08-13-2013, 12:23 PM
LASJayhawk's Avatar
LASJayhawk LASJayhawk is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 651
Default

It is a mixture of propane and butane.

The EPA says it is an unacceptable substitute: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/refrig.../unaccept.html

There are EPA approved substitutes that wont turn your car into a plasma cutter if you get a high side leak and it gets lit off: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/refrig....html#mvacpubs

IMHO: This is a case where I agree completely with the EPA's stance. Stick with the original refrigerant if you can, and convert to an approved substitute when the original is no longer available in your area.

You cars fuel system was designed to carry a flammable, your A/C was not.

__________________
65 Bonneville Brougham 4DHT
65 Grand Prix 2DHT......now parts
65 Catalina 2+2 2DHT
65 Catalina Safari 4DSW
  #6  
Old 08-17-2013, 01:48 PM
LATECH's Avatar
LATECH LATECH is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Indoors
Posts: 594
Default

I am with LASjayhawk on this one. Can you imagine the explosion if an evaporator leaked into a car with a lit cigarette?
Like LAS jay said, the fuel system was designed for flammables, the AC...not so much.
If it was better and cheaper...the OEM would be using it.

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017