#1  
Old 12-26-2013, 11:23 AM
Bruce Meyer's Avatar
Bruce Meyer Bruce Meyer is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 1,460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 72LuxuryLeMansLa. View Post
I got my manifold here: http://sdperformance.com/viewProduct.php?productID=1727 it was $375.00
Wow! 375 plus the cost of the manifold (around 75) and you have 450+ in a cast iron manifold. Not to mention shipping to and from SD. Crazy! You can get a new Torker 2 for 250. On a well built 455 I would bet cash that it would outperform the iron one.

The Following User Says Thank You to Bruce Meyer For This Useful Post:
  #2  
Old 12-26-2013, 11:45 AM
paul s.'s Avatar
paul s. paul s. is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 327
Default

These threads become funny after awhile because some people just have to be right. We all see the components used on an individual's engine --- a square-bore carb on a spread-bore intake with a spacer--- not the first pairing most would make on this board but they were the components HE HAD to work with.

Then there was a switch to an aftermarket intake.

It doesn't get any simpler than that.

Did it show that the aftermarket intake was better? Yes... IN THIS CASE.... WITH THESE PARTS. So don't get your feelings hurt.

Would a Q-jet show a different outcome? Pretty sure it would. So maybe that could be round 3.

How difficult is this?



Just saw Tom's post. Nice post.

__________________
Sandoval Performance
www.sandovalperformance.com
Pontiac Crate Engines
CNC Edelbrock heads
Custom Ground Cams
JOHNSON Limited Travel Hydraulic Roller Lifters

Last edited by paul s.; 12-26-2013 at 11:47 AM. Reason: tom
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to paul s. For This Useful Post:
  #3  
Old 12-26-2013, 11:47 AM
GOAT WHORE's Avatar
GOAT WHORE GOAT WHORE is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,695
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Meyer View Post
Wow! 375 plus the cost of the manifold (around 75) and you have 450+ in a cast iron manifold. Not to mention shipping to and from SD. Crazy! You can get a new Torker 2 for 250. On a well built 455 I would bet cash that it would outperform the iron one.
Bruce, most people already have a stock manifold laying around if not a dozen so minus $75 from your figures. I also believe that SD Performance price is less if you have the heads done at the same time. Some also realise the benefits of running an after market manifold but want to retain the stock apearance for one reason or another.

__________________
1969 GTO 4spd. Antique Gold/black, gold int.
1969 GTO RAIII 4spd. Verdoro Green/black, black int.
1969 GTO 4spd. Crystal Turquoise, black int.
1970 GTO 4spd VOE Pepper Green, green int.
1967 LeMans 428 Auto. Blue, black int.

Last edited by GOAT WHORE; 12-26-2013 at 11:53 AM.
  #4  
Old 12-26-2013, 12:03 PM
72LuxuryLeMansLa.'s Avatar
72LuxuryLeMansLa. 72LuxuryLeMansLa. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Eunice, La.
Posts: 3,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Meyer View Post
Wow! 375 plus the cost of the manifold (around 75) and you have 450+ in a cast iron manifold. Not to mention shipping to and from SD. Crazy! You can get a new Torker 2 for 250. On a well built 455 I would bet cash that it would outperform the iron one.
I paid nothing for the core intake. I forgot about shipping the core, that was $60.00 . I'm fairly certain that the $375.00 included the shipping to me. So, I paid $435.00 for an intake that will look 100% stock but perform very well with the SD ported 6X-4 heads, Stump Puller cam and RARE 2.5" Exhaust Manifolds I am using. On a 100% street application I would bet cash it will out perform the T-2. The stock look is very important for me. I'm building a 4" stroke, .030" over 400 (433ci) that will look like a mid 70's low compression 400 except for the exhaust manifolds. So not "crazy" at all from my perspective.

__________________
Karl

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 72LuxuryLeMansLa. For This Useful Post:
  #5  
Old 12-26-2013, 12:17 PM
paul s.'s Avatar
paul s. paul s. is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 72LuxuryLeMansLa. View Post
I paid nothing for the core intake. I forgot about shipping the core, that was $60.00 . I'm fairly certain that the $375.00 included the shipping to me. So, I paid $435.00 for an intake that will look 100% stock but perform very well with the SD ported 6X-4 heads, Stump Puller cam and RARE 2.5" Exhaust Manifolds I am using. On a 100% street application I would bet cash it will out perform the T-2. The stock look is very important for me. I'm building a 4" stroke, .030" over 400 (433ci) that will look like a mid 70's low compression 400 except for the exhaust manifolds. So not "crazy" at all from my perspective.
Nice. I like a good sleeper. But I would take that bet on the T2.

__________________
Sandoval Performance
www.sandovalperformance.com
Pontiac Crate Engines
CNC Edelbrock heads
Custom Ground Cams
JOHNSON Limited Travel Hydraulic Roller Lifters
The Following User Says Thank You to paul s. For This Useful Post:
  #6  
Old 12-26-2013, 12:34 PM
72LuxuryLeMansLa.'s Avatar
72LuxuryLeMansLa. 72LuxuryLeMansLa. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Eunice, La.
Posts: 3,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paul s. View Post
Nice. I like a good sleeper. But I would take that bet on the T2.
Thanks Paul. All depends on how we define "perform" in this case...... I should have said on my 100% street application........

__________________
Karl

  #7  
Old 12-26-2013, 12:39 PM
paul s.'s Avatar
paul s. paul s. is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 327
Default

I hear you . I assumed you would go WOT at some point LOL!

__________________
Sandoval Performance
www.sandovalperformance.com
Pontiac Crate Engines
CNC Edelbrock heads
Custom Ground Cams
JOHNSON Limited Travel Hydraulic Roller Lifters
  #8  
Old 12-26-2013, 12:42 PM
72LuxuryLeMansLa.'s Avatar
72LuxuryLeMansLa. 72LuxuryLeMansLa. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Eunice, La.
Posts: 3,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paul s. View Post
I hear you . I assumed you would go WOT at some point LOL!
I'm going to say yes..... But since most of the "performance" I will need is throttle response at low rpm and light throttle highway cruising you see where I'm liking the iron with those heads and cam......

__________________
Karl

  #9  
Old 12-26-2013, 02:03 PM
paul s.'s Avatar
paul s. paul s. is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 72LuxuryLeMansLa. View Post
I'm going to say yes..... But since most of the "performance" I will need is throttle response at low rpm and light throttle highway cruising you see where I'm liking the iron with those heads and cam......
Absolutely. Just having some fun!

__________________
Sandoval Performance
www.sandovalperformance.com
Pontiac Crate Engines
CNC Edelbrock heads
Custom Ground Cams
JOHNSON Limited Travel Hydraulic Roller Lifters
The Following User Says Thank You to paul s. For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:05 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017