THE LOBBY A gathering place. Introductions, sports, showin' off your ride, birthday-anniversary-milestone, achievements, family oriented humor.

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-09-2014, 12:31 PM
73T/A 73T/A is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 207
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeNoun View Post
The Beatles were not trite back then. When you see their 1964-1966 performances, people think they're corny, a bit lightweight. But in 1963-1964, no one saw anything like this before.

There were no bands on the charts back then, and by that I mean ROCK bands. The Beatles were the first rock band, and became the blueprint for every band that followed in the 60's and beyond.

The Beach Boys were popular in America in 1963, but they had very little musical talent, just a great songwriter in Brian Wilson, and of course great harmonies. All the other singing groups of the day were lead singers with a backup band (Elvis, Sam Cooke, Tony Bennett, The Four Seasons, Bobby Darin, etc).

The Beatles were a group. All four could sing, three of them (John, Paul, George) were lead singers. With two guitar players, bass, drums, harmonies, exceptional song writing, long hair, thick accents, sharp humor, the world was waiting for something like this.
The Beatles are great,but as John Lennon said,"before Elvis there was nothing".Elvis kicked the door down for everybody else to follow.

__________________
2001 Trans Am,WS6 Sunset Orange Metallic (sold)
1973 Trans Am 455,4speed
1970 GTO
  #2  
Old 02-09-2014, 12:58 PM
MikeNoun's Avatar
MikeNoun MikeNoun is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Chi-Town, IL
Posts: 1,736
Default

I agree, Elvis was the first, he broke down the barriers for rock and roll.

McCartney, Harrison, and especially Lennon, all idolized Elvis. But it was the music of Buddy Holly that swayed them the most. In fact, the name "Beetles" was in tribute to the Crickets, and Lennon changed the "e" to an "a" as a play on words (promoters back then hated the name Beatles, they thought it was corny and immature, and thought they should change it). Buddy Holly was the prototype for a rock and roll musical group, as he played guitar (rhythm and lead), wrote his own songs (which really blew the minds of Lennon and McCartney when they found this out), and Buddy had what would become the prototype for a rock group; two guitars, bass, and drums.

The Beatles brought out the rock group format that Buddy Holly started, with two guitars, bass, and drums. The difference was that The Beatles had 3 lead singers, plus a drummer who could sing when required.

What many people don't realize is that The Beatles were hard rock, VERY hard rock, compared to other acts of the day. The Beatles were the bad boys of rock and roll, until their manager decided their stage act needed to be cleaned up in order to make it big.

__________________
1959-1980 Pontiac Window Sticker Reproductions : http://www.pontiacwindowstickers.com

My Bio: I am currently writing articles for POCI's Smoke Signals magazine and enjoy promoting and discussing the history of the Pontiac Motor Division.
The Following User Says Thank You to MikeNoun For This Useful Post:
  #3  
Old 02-09-2014, 01:14 PM
PonchoV8 PonchoV8 is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,473
Default

I don't dispute that it was time...long past time for a new beginning. But I disagree. Those lyrics and music are trite and sugar pop.

It doesn't take anything away from the period. For instance look at Sabbath and what they did, forging new ground. But listen to the riffs and music and from THIS PERSPECTIVE ONLY, it was simplistic. Simple is good. They're each also outstanding musicians and (like the Fab also were) an incredible band together.


Last edited by PonchoV8; 02-09-2014 at 01:20 PM.
  #4  
Old 02-09-2014, 01:29 PM
bird72's Avatar
bird72 bird72 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Gila
Posts: 2,318
Default

I look at two Beatles. I don't play the first few albums, but Revolver is a masterpiece, Rubber Soul is good also. So the latter Beatles were another thing, and trite doesn't come to mind for me, but everyone's MPG varies....

__________________
72 Bird
  #5  
Old 02-09-2014, 01:35 PM
Bob Dillon's Avatar
Bob Dillon Bob Dillon is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Gilroy, California, USA-Garlic Capital of the world!
Posts: 406
Thumbs up Yeah, yeah, yeah...

Yeah yeah yeah, YEAH!

Yup, remember it well.

  #6  
Old 02-09-2014, 01:48 PM
PonchoV8 PonchoV8 is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,473
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bird72 View Post
I look at two Beatles. I don't play the first few albums, but Revolver is a masterpiece, Rubber Soul is good also. So the latter Beatles were another thing, and trite doesn't come to mind for me, but everyone's MPG varies....
Same opinion here. I'm talking about the first songs. But look at Shake It Up Baby later in the video. I don't consider it trite, but simple and raw. One of the best vocal bridges in history. I hope to not be misunderstood.

  #7  
Old 02-09-2014, 02:12 PM
MikeNoun's Avatar
MikeNoun MikeNoun is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Chi-Town, IL
Posts: 1,736
Default

I understand what you're saying, and I agree, there are a few of their songs that are trite. But no worse than "Hound Dog", or "Be-Bop-A-Lu-La", "Splish Splash", "Peggy Sue", or countless other songs that made it to the top. The difference was that Lennon and McCartney wrote their own stuff, and that was absolutely ground breaking at the time. There was no other rock group that wrote their own material, with the exception being Brian Wilson of The Beach Boys, and Buddy Holly.

Their early songs did have Lennon and McCartney teething a bit, but then they found their groove quickly with "Please Please Me" and "I Saw Her Standing There". They were more interested in song publishing at that time, thinking they would be the next Goffin-King or Rogers-Hammerstein. But things changed rapidly after 1963.

__________________
1959-1980 Pontiac Window Sticker Reproductions : http://www.pontiacwindowstickers.com

My Bio: I am currently writing articles for POCI's Smoke Signals magazine and enjoy promoting and discussing the history of the Pontiac Motor Division.
The Following User Says Thank You to MikeNoun For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:54 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017