THE LOBBY A gathering place. Introductions, sports, showin' off your ride, birthday-anniversary-milestone, achievements, family oriented humor.

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-14-2014, 02:09 PM
rohrt rohrt is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 4,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Seymore View Post
Sidebar: Speaking of which....

I was just reading in the society of automotive engineers (SAE) member magazine about the most recent Supermileage competition held at the Eaton Proving Ground in Marshall Michigan.

They showed that the winning team, Quebec's Universite' Laval, won the event with an average of 1145 mpg.

If I remember correctly, back when I was doing this with GMI (in the early 1980's) the University of Saskatchewan dominated the event year after year with fuel enonomy numbers just over the 1000 mpg range.

So - thirty years later and the identical fuel economy numbers?

Perhaps there is only so much energy you can squeeze from a gallon of gas...

:shrug:

Back to topic -

K
Those competitions are interesting but far from any type of real world driving.

The competition should be hauling a family of 4 1200 miles in 16 hours.

  #2  
Old 07-14-2014, 03:08 PM
Keith Seymore's Avatar
Keith Seymore Keith Seymore is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Motor City
Posts: 8,509
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rohrt View Post
Those competitions are interesting but far from any type of real world driving.

The competition should be hauling a family of 4 1200 miles in 16 hours.
C'mon. You don't think you could get 4 people in this?



True story time: back when we were doing this the minimum driver weight was 150 lbs.

We had one team member (happened to be my college room mate and best man in my wedding) weighed in about 149 lbs and a few ounces. We ballasted him down with all the pocket change we could muster.

Plus, we didn't let him pee until after he passed tech...



By the way, the prevailing strategy (then, and now it seems) was to accelerate up to a given speed, shut the engine off and coast (forever) until the desired minimum speed was reached. Repeat.

There was one team that attempted to run steady state at a given engine rpm but they weren't even competitive with a fuel economy in the 200 mpg range.

The bottom line is that you are not burning any gasoline when the engine is off. It becomes primarily an exercise in controlling mass and aerodynamics and reduced rolling resistance.

K

__________________
'63 LeMans Convertible
'63 Grand Prix
'65 GTO - original, unrestored, Dad was original owner, 5000 original mile Royal Pontiac factory racer
'74 Chevelle - original owner, 9.56 @ 139 mph besthttp://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/
My Pontiac Story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524
"Intro from an old Assembly Plant Guy":http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926
  #3  
Old 07-14-2014, 03:26 PM
hurryinhoosier62 hurryinhoosier62 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Floyd Co., IN/SE KY
Posts: 4,075
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Seymore View Post
C'mon. You don't think you could get 4 people in this?



True story time: back when we were doing this the minimum driver weight was 150 lbs.

We had one team member (happened to be my college room mate and best man in my wedding) weighed in about 149 lbs and a few ounces. We ballasted him down with all the pocket change we could muster.

Plus, we didn't let him pee until after he passed tech...



By the way, the prevailing strategy (then, and now it seems) was to accelerate up to a given speed, shut the engine off and coast (forever) until the desired minimum speed was reached. Repeat.

There was one team that attempted to run steady state at a given engine rpm but they weren't even competitive with a fuel economy in the 200 mpg range.

The bottom line is that you are not burning any gasoline when the engine is off. It becomes primarily an exercise in controlling mass and aerodynamics and reduced rolling resistance.

K
In reality, it wouldn't hold ONE of my big feet!

__________________
“It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance.”

Dr. Thomas Sowell
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017