Home Menu

Menu


Pontiac - Race The next Level

          
PY Online Forums - Bringing the Pontiac Hobby Together > General Classic PONTIAC TECH > Pontiac - Race > 2.3 HP per cu. in. ??????????
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-29-2015, 05:17 PM
Dragncar Dragncar is offline
Ultimate Warrior
  
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Humbolt County California
Posts: 9,233
Default
I don't know Brian. But the HO Racing folks are still around here. They have placed some pics of the engine with the sbc tunnel ram here.
I would have to believe a short stroke 326ci engine with RAIV heads flowing close to 300cfm would have to pull past 7000RPMs. I have this 8200 number in my head.
Maybe one of them can let us know.
OK, I just PMed Craig Hendrickson from HO. Maybe he will let us know more about that 326!

Last edited by Dragncar; 03-29-2015 at 05:29 PM.
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-29-2015, 05:39 PM
johnta1's Avatar
johnta1 johnta1 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
  
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: now sunny Florida!
Posts: 22,516
Default
HO Racing Tunnel Ram



Some of these kids need to remember the past.


__________________
John Wallace - johnta1
Pontiac Power RULES !!!
www.wallaceracing.com

Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova
Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats

KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever!

W.E.C moment


"Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts."

"People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-30-2015, 10:52 PM
john marcella john marcella is offline
Ultimate Warrior
  
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,033
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnta1 View Post
HO Racing Tunnel Ram



Some of these kids need to remember the past.

The past is the past for a reason!

__________________
John Marcella
Marcella Manifolds Inc.
[email protected]
ph. 248-259-6696
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-31-2015, 06:56 AM
GTOGEORGE's Avatar
GTOGEORGE GTOGEORGE is offline
Suspended
  
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Rockwood, MICHIGAN
Posts: 8,884
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by john marcella View Post
The past is the past for a reason!
That is a SILLY remark................KIDS!


GTO George

Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-31-2015, 11:49 AM
mike leech's Avatar
mike leech mike leech is offline
Ultimate Warrior
  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,658
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTOGEORGE View Post
That is a SILLY remark................KIDS!


GTO George
You may think so....but its still a true statement.

Craig and kern were inivators for sure. And pioneers in many ways. What you refuse to see is there are others pioneering advancements today.

__________________
EHTTFMF!


Being dead, it is not hard on you. You don't even know you're dead. It is hard on everyone else that is not dead.
BEING STUPID WORKS THE SAME WAY! The rest of us suffer.
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-31-2015, 05:39 PM
cfmcnc cfmcnc is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 686
Default 2.3HP oer cu-in
Technology Marches On.Bill C.

__________________
Checkered Flag Machine & Ceralli Competition Engines
Racing engines and induction development

http://www.checkeredflagmachine.net/
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-31-2015, 07:24 PM
Half-Inch Stud's Avatar
Half-Inch Stud Half-Inch Stud is offline
Ultimate Warrior
  
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: BlueBell, PA or AL U.S.A.
Posts: 18,898
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfmcnc View Post
Technology Marches On.Bill C.

Technology has also gotten lost (forever). I've seen it with capital equipment being destroyed, capabilities lost, and organazations scattered. And yes the dumb these days think they are wiser, with doing "firsts" in tweaks and sorts.

Oh if we had continuity in development pursuits, todays results would look different, and be different. Perhaps better. Perhaps pigeon-holed. HIS

Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-31-2015, 10:40 PM
v869tr6's Avatar
v869tr6 v869tr6 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
  
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,128
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by john marcella View Post
The past is the past for a reason!
Did a little math, the Crow ran 166.87 mph in the 1/8 on a pass where he blow the tires off.
If the Crow weights 2800lbs ( I have no idea what it weighs) the Wallace calc. shows 2021 hp at the crank, or 4.19 HP per each of the 482 cubic inches.

Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-31-2015, 10:50 PM
JSPONT's Avatar
JSPONT JSPONT is offline
Ultimate Warrior
  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: ROCKY POINT NY
Posts: 2,917
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by v869tr6 View Post
Did a little math, the Crow ran 166.87 mph in the 1/8 on a pass where he blow the tires off.
If the Crow weights 2800lbs ( I have no idea what it weighs) the Wallace calc. shows 2021 hp at the crank, or 4.19 HP per each of the 482 cubic inches.
I think they are talking N.A. It is nice what a hairdryer can do!!

Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Hybrid Mode Hybrid Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:26 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Contact Us Home
Copyright © 2017