#1  
Old 06-17-2015, 08:17 PM
72LuxuryLeMansLa.'s Avatar
72LuxuryLeMansLa. 72LuxuryLeMansLa. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Eunice, La.
Posts: 3,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 68azbird View Post
Friend had that in his 462 driveability yes. For performance it was a big turd.
You want to define "big turd" for us? According to SD Performance "In a recent dyno test this cam installed in a 464ci engine with 9.5 to 1 compression, a set of our 250-260cfm CNC ported #11 cast iron heads, CNC ported cast iron Q-jet intake and a prepped Q-jet carb made 503hp and 575+ lb/ft of torque on 91 octane."

In my world 575lb/ft and 503HP does not equate to a "big turd" but is a respectable car. WE ARE in the street section after all.

__________________
Karl

  #2  
Old 06-17-2015, 10:17 PM
68azbird 68azbird is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: AZ
Posts: 739
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 72LuxuryLeMansLa. View Post
You want to define "big turd" for us? According to SD Performance "In a recent dyno test this cam installed in a 464ci engine with 9.5 to 1 compression, a set of our 250-260cfm CNC ported #11 cast iron heads, CNC ported cast iron Q-jet intake and a prepped Q-jet carb made 503hp and 575+ lb/ft of torque on 91 octane."

In my world 575lb/ft and 503HP does not equate to a "big turd" but is a respectable car. WE ARE in the street section after all.
Lol
Engine had 4x cnc SD heads and same compression and was done by 4500 rpm
3900lb car ran 13.25 - 13.40's
Didn't run much faster when he changed to edelbrocks and 2 camshafts later.

  #3  
Old 06-18-2015, 02:14 AM
ponyakr's Avatar
ponyakr ponyakr is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North Louisiana
Posts: 7,621
Default 744 ?

I see guys always jumping from an 068 to an 041. What about the 744 RA3 stick cam. I've heard at least one guy really badmouth this cam. But, on paper, it looks like it would be just a bit better than the 068 in a 455--somewhere between the 068 & the 041. Just lookin at the specs on the Summit cams, it appears that the 2801 is just a higher lift version of the 068, and the 2802 is a high lift version of the 744.

So, how bout it ? Anybody use the 744 in a 455 ? How bout the 2802 ? I realize we are talkin low rpm grunt here, below 5000rpm.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Engine-Camsh...4bee4b&vxp=mtr

Then I suppose the next step up, but just below the 041 is the Crower 60243. So who has some results to report on this cam. I think I've seen Cliff mention this one.

http://www.crower.com/camshafts/pont...m-284-hdp.html


Last edited by ponyakr; 06-18-2015 at 02:30 AM.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:28 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017