#1  
Old 07-04-2015, 09:25 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Vaught View Post
Really. A SB Ford with 2 stages was running those numbers ay the same weight years ago.
I would hope they could do better than a 412 cid Ford Small Block engine (with a much bigger engine and 3 stages). Lets see some 7.40s.

Tom V.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KO View Post
John Force went 3s with a Ford plastic body with a Mopar engine which is just as relevant on this site
1) The Ford has Nitrous (2 stages)
Fulton has Nitrous 3 stages

2) The Ford had a Dry Sump System
Fulton has a Dry Sump System

3) The Ford was running a Canted Valve "Old School" Yates head
Fulton is running a canted valve head.

4) The Ford was running a 10.5 W tire
Fulton probably has something better years later.

5) The Ford as was said was running basically a small engine (with rpm)
Fulton is running a much larger engine within 500 rpm of the Ford engine's rpm

6) Compression ratio is similar if you believe the posts on the board.

So how do these specs resemble a John Force plastic bodied vehicle with a Mopar engine?

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #2  
Old 07-04-2015, 10:02 PM
KO KO is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Newark DE USA
Posts: 929
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Vaught View Post
1) The Ford has Nitrous (2 stages)
Fulton has Nitrous 3 stages

2) The Ford had a Dry Sump System
Fulton has a Dry Sump System

3) The Ford was running a Canted Valve "Old School" Yates head
Fulton is running a canted valve head.

4) The Ford was running a 10.5 W tire
Fulton probably has something better years later.

5) The Ford as was said was running basically a small engine (with rpm)
Fulton is running a much larger engine within 500 rpm of the Ford engine's rpm

6) Compression ratio is similar if you believe the posts on the board.

So how do these specs resemble a John Force plastic bodied vehicle with a Mopar engine?

Tom V.
no real Pontiac enthusiast gives a damn about what some Ford runs
1000s of max effort Fords out there, only a dozen or so all out Pontiacs
"old school" heads with 50 years of development compared to street heads worked over

a real comparison would be an FE Ford vs. Pontiac...not even close

__________________
1989 Automotive Hall of Fame Inductee
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:40 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017