THE LOBBY A gathering place. Introductions, sports, showin' off your ride, birthday-anniversary-milestone, achievements, family oriented humor.

          
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-31-2016, 06:29 PM
mgarblik mgarblik is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,992
Default

As GOATWGN stated, when you work on new stuff all day, you don't have any desire to own a high dollar new car to drive home at night. As I posted elsewhere, I recently owned a 5L new Mustang GT 6-speed. A great car, a high 12 second car, 300-400 lbs lighter than a Challenger or Camaro. Nothing ever went wrong with it. 30 MPG on the highway in 6th gear at 1500 RPM's at 80 MPH. But it's a completely different sensation, boring if you will drive, compared to an old muscle car. Old cars are not for everybody. They rattle and squeak, they have wind noise, they have lousy brakes and marginal steering compared to a modern muscle car, and they are slower when comparing stock to stock. Don't care, I like driving my 62 Catalina much more than the Coyote Mustang much to the complete dismay of my understanding wife.

  #2  
Old 06-01-2016, 12:27 AM
Jim Doran's Avatar
Jim Doran Jim Doran is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: New Milford,CT. USA
Posts: 1,256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgarblik View Post
As I posted elsewhere, I recently owned a 5L new Mustang GT 6-speed. A great car, a high 12 second car, 300-400 lbs lighter than a Challenger or Camaro.
No desire to hijack or start an argument, but wanted to keep the facts straight on camaro vs mustang weights. Camaro is lighter than the mustang.

2016 Camaro: 455 hp, 455 lb-ft, 3,685 lbs (manual); 8.1 lbs/hp

2016 Mustang: 435 hp, 400 lb-ft, 3,705 (manual); 8.5 lbs/hp

__________________
-Jim Doran-
1965 389 Tripower; 4 speed; convertible
2019 Tesla Model 3 Performance
2016 Chevy SS; Sold
2001 Toyota Tacoma 4x4
2008 Infiniti G35x
  #3  
Old 06-01-2016, 05:59 PM
vidguy's Avatar
vidguy vidguy is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 3,822
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgarblik View Post
Old cars are not for everybody. They rattle and squeak, they have wind noise, they have lousy brakes and marginal steering compared to a modern muscle car, and they are slower when comparing stock to stock. Don't care, I like driving my 62 Catalina much more than the Coyote Mustang much to the complete dismay of my understanding wife.
Yeah I feel the same way as I stomp the gas in my Formula that is my Daily Driver..My wife sorta gets it..
But we rattle and squeak too..

__________________
--
James

Work
'67 GTO Convertible "Koerner Built 413 500 hp with a Victor!.. I'll run a stock intake."
'75 Formula 400 - Daily Driver -
Running with my Home Built 455 and TH400

Details here:
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=588372
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:12 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017