[BruceWilkie]

[QUOTE=PAUL K;5632409]

Originally Posted by BruceWilkie

Not hatin' on you Paul but making remarks worded so you can later deny you meant anything "bad" by them is chicken ****. So is deflecting questions.

/QUOTE]

Would this be worse than making up the facts as you go along?

What question did I deflect?

Lets start here and get back to that^^^...

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1010

Some people in this thread jump to conclusions.... also some perfer to make their own facts up.

I followed with...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1013

Who?? Name names so we know who you are talking about.

Before next reply to me paul posts this...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1026

TTB is very well versed in expected gains from increased power. All of his CV1 combos have made more power than their predecessor.

I respond to post 1026
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1034

So who lost power over previous heads Paul? Do tell.

BTW you deserve a point of credit this time...at least you dropped a name.

Your response...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1038

Please reread my post....then explain what you are asking.

My reply...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1091

Re-read your own post. It implies Bill makes things up and his heads have not shown improvement over others previous heads.

My reply was simply asking you to point out where there hasnt been improvement.

I didnt ask you to deflect the question.

Not hatin' on you Paul but making remarks worded so you can later deny you meant anything "bad" by them is chicken ****. So is deflecting questions.

If you want to criticize Bills work show him how its done then.
Get a work piece, set and agree on targets, and find a neutral party to test against each others work.
Doesnt have to be a CV head...maybe someone has a damaged unported E-head (or other)that could be cut to be a work piece for both of you.

* I probably should have discussed this with Bill but I think he'd accept the challenge.

pauls reply.(note still no answer to the question in post 1034^^^)
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1092

There you go jumping to conclusions and getting all butt hurt over your own words, again.

paul additionaly says...

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1099

[quote]

Originally Posted by BruceWilkie

Not hatin' on you Paul but making remarks worded so you can later deny you meant anything "bad" by them is chicken ****. So is deflecting questions.

/QUOTE]

Would this be worse than making up the facts as you go along?

What question did I deflect?

For saying "you" I guess that means me...close enough to a name... you get another credit.
SO now im making up facts? Please share with everyone what "facts" I've made up! This should be interesting. Be sure to provide reference and dont forget any I acknowledge when I've got something wrong.

As to the questions you deflected... See posts 1013 1026 and 1034
The questions asked in those 3 posts.

All here in one post to save you from jumping page to page.


Seems like you're taking lessons from Gach and hoping you can cloud your posts till they get buried in new posts. Maybe he'll give you a good report card and a sticker.

[PAUL K]

[QUOTE=BruceWilkie;5632580][QUOTE=PAUL K;5632409]

Lets start here and get back to that^^^...

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1010



I followed with...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1013



Before next reply to me paul posts this...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1026



I respond to post 1026
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1034



Your response...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1038



My reply...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1091



pauls reply.(note still no answer to the question in post 1034^^^)
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1092



paul additionaly says...

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1099

For saying "you" I guess that means me...close enough to a name... you get another credit.
SO now im making up facts? Please share with everyone what "facts" I've made up! This should be interesting. Be sure to provide reference and dont forget any I acknowledge when I've got something wrong.

As to the questions you deflected... See posts 1013 1026 and 1034
The questions asked in those 3 posts.

All here in one post to save you from jumping page to page.


Seems like you're taking lessons from Gach and hoping you can cloud your posts till they get buried in new posts. Maybe he'll give you a good report card and a sticker.

Bruce, you are much better at computer stuff than me. I'll do my best to answer all your questions. You make facts up! You've mentioned more than once Fulton's CV1 combo went faster than his Gabby Eheads.... that is a lie! 100% made up! You stated that DF's CV1/Ehead stock block dyno test had EIC heads....another made up fact. You stated DF's heads have never been removed this year, TTB says they've had the pistons out on a freshen up and DF stated he's had piston issues.....looks like another fact you made up. You're constantly jumping to conclusions..... I make a post backing up TTB's claims and you are ready to fight because you think some how I am anti CV1....which isn't true at all. I'm all about the truth, which you are not unless the truth supports your beliefs.

If I was anti CV1 I would point out that DF ran 7.7 with his Ehead combo roughly six years ago. Fast forward with a new build and much better technology along with improved carburetors and a dry sump he has ran 7.6. I understand that is with less nitrous but we have no idea if the combination will respond to more nitrous favorably. I would also point out that he has a top notch chassis with big tires and only has Cosgrove's Ehead combination covered by a tenth or so and Cosgrove's chassis is leaf springs, Cal-track and smaller tires. Cosgrove's car is ten times more "street" than DF's car, I've seen both cars in person.. I would also point out that DF has Kinsler's much smaller cid Ehead combination covered by a tenth or so and Kinsler has a small tire, Cal-Track leaf spring suspension 1/8 mile car using a single four and plate ...not two fours and a dual fogger. But since I'm not a CV1 hater I won't mention the above.

I apologize to Cosgrove and Kinsler for mentioning their names but I didn't really see a way around it. Both their cars are bad azz and do the Pontiac community proud.

[LiL Jack]

[QUOTE=PAUL K;5632607][QUOTE=BruceWilkie;5632580]

Originally Posted by PAUL K

Lets start here and get back to that^^^...

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1010



I followed with...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1013



Before next reply to me paul posts this...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1026



I respond to post 1026
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1034



Your response...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1038



My reply...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1091



pauls reply.(note still no answer to the question in post 1034^^^)
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1092



paul additionaly says...

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1099



Bruce, you are much better at computer stuff than me. I'll do my best to answer all your questions. You make facts up! You've mentioned more than once Fulton's CV1 combo went faster than his Gabby Eheads.... that is a lie! 100% made up! You stated that DF's CV1/Ehead stock block dyno test had EIC heads....another made up fact. You stated DF's heads have never been removed this year, TTB says they've had the pistons out on a freshen up and DF stated he's had piston issues.....looks like another fact you made up. You're constantly jumping to conclusions..... I make a post backing up TTB's claims and you are ready to fight because you think some how I am anti CV1....which isn't true at all. I'm all about the truth, which you are not unless the truth supports your beliefs.

If I was anti CV1 I would point out that DF ran 7.7 with his Ehead combo roughly six years ago. Fast forward with a new build and much better technology along with improved carburetors and a dry sump he has ran 7.6. I understand that is with less nitrous but we have no idea if the combination will respond to more nitrous favorably. I would also point out that he has a top notch chassis with big tires and only has Cosgrove's Ehead combination covered by a tenth or so and Cosgrove's chassis is leaf springs, Cal-track and smaller tires. Cosgrove's car is ten times more "street" than DF's car, I've seen both cars in person.. I would also point out that DF has Kinsler's much smaller cid Ehead combination covered by a tenth or so and Kinsler has a small tire, Cal-Track leaf spring suspension 1/8 mile car using a single four and plate ...not two fours and a dual fogger. But since I'm not a CV1 hater I won't mention the above.

I apologize to Cosgrove and Kinsler for mentioning their names but I didn't really see a way around it. Both their cars are bad azz and do the Pontiac community proud.

A lot of truth in there!

[PAUL K]

Originally Posted by LiL Jack

A lot of truth in there!

The only BS is Bruce's!

[cdrookie]

PAUL K for president!

[BruceWilkie]

[QUOTE=PAUL K;5632607][QUOTE=BruceWilkie;5632580]

Originally Posted by PAUL K

Lets start here and get back to that^^^...

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1010



I followed with...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1013



Before next reply to me paul posts this...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1026



I respond to post 1026
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1034



Your response...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1038



My reply...
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1091



pauls reply.(note still no answer to the question in post 1034^^^)
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1092



paul additionaly says...

http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...postcount=1099



Bruce, you are much better at computer stuff than me. I'll do my best to answer all your questions. You make facts up! You've mentioned more than once Fulton's CV1 combo went faster than his Gabby Eheads.... that is a lie! 100% made up! You stated that DF's CV1/Ehead stock block dyno test had EIC heads....another made up fact. You stated DF's heads have never been removed this year, TTB says they've had the pistons out on a freshen up and DF stated he's had piston issues.....looks like another fact you made up. You're constantly jumping to conclusions..... I make a post backing up TTB's claims and you are ready to fight because you think some how I am anti CV1....which isn't true at all. I'm all about the truth, which you are not unless the truth supports your beliefs.

If I was anti CV1 I would point out that DF ran 7.7 with his Ehead combo roughly six years ago. Fast forward with a new build and much better technology along with improved carburetors and a dry sump he has ran 7.6. I understand that is with less nitrous but we have no idea if the combination will respond to more nitrous favorably. I would also point out that he has a top notch chassis with big tires and only has Cosgrove's Ehead combination covered by a tenth or so and Cosgrove's chassis is leaf springs, Cal-track and smaller tires. Cosgrove's car is ten times more "street" than DF's car, I've seen both cars in person.. I would also point out that DF has Kinsler's much smaller cid Ehead combination covered by a tenth or so and Kinsler has a small tire, Cal-Track leaf spring suspension 1/8 mile car using a single four and plate ...not two fours and a dual fogger. But since I'm not a CV1 hater I won't mention the above.

I apologize to Cosgrove and Kinsler for mentioning their names but I didn't really see a way around it. Both their cars are bad azz and do the Pontiac community proud.

I'll try to follow your order.
Dick set a personal best ETat Norwalk with CV1's. He also got a pass in at 180+but slower ET on a motor that wasnt 100% (on DOT tires not his slicks)
FACT that is faster and quicker than old combo.

Fact less N2O being used.

Weight... seems to be some controversy... I have not said anything on weight with old combo not sure what it was. Not on PY and especially not PZ... I havent been allowed to post in years because I proved him wrong about something.
Dick claims heavier than claimed on the reputable PZ board. I'd say Dick is far more credible than the person who can alter posts over there.
3130-3140 race weight at Norwalk per Dick and Bill 3180 at Beech Bend.(track prep sucked so maybe ballast. I never asked )
I made it to Beech Bend the track was miserable so were the temps. Even there, the car went 179 and ran in the 7's Ask GTOGeorge and others how nice the track and weather wasnt.

Heads off... I was wrong. I found out several days after posting. Should have posted an apology and correction then. Looking back I cant really say what gave me the impression I had. Brian and others...sorry about that.

Ok Whose E heads were used on the DF dyno test if they werent Gaby's?
I've never said EIC, just Gaby, so dont add words I didnt say. If Im wrong show me who's they were and I'll admit misinformation.

For the record I've been a fan of Kinsler since I met him at a RAM race in Virginia. 2009 IIRC. Dont think I've met Cosgrove, havent followed him. Both fast cars.
Dont see your point of dragging them in when thread is about Fulton and Little Jack.
Dick seems far from being fully sorted so you cant say it cant do better. Current results look promising. Only car I've criticized is little jack. And thats largely due to him running his mouth.

Lastly paul I dont just sit around and make things up. I try to post what I know is true vs believe to be true. I post an opinion I usually preface it with IMO. There is no one here who never erred or had wrong info or simply confused something said with something else said.

Glad you got around to name names vs guessing games of who your referring too.

[PAUL K]

[QUOTE=BruceWilkie;5632763][QUOTE=PAUL K;5632607]

Originally Posted by BruceWilkie

I'll try to follow your order.
Dick set a personal best ETat Norwalk with CV1's. He also got a pass in at 180+but slower ET on a motor that wasnt 100% (on DOT tires not his slicks)
FACT that is faster and quicker than old combo.

Fact less N2O being used.

Weight... seems to be some controversy... I have not said anything on weight with old combo not sure what it was. Not on PY and especially not PZ... I havent been allowed to post in years because I proved him wrong about something.
Dick claims heavier than claimed on the reputable PZ board. I'd say Dick is far more credible than the person who can alter posts over there.
3130-3140 race weight at Norwalk per Dick and Bill 3180 at Beech Bend.(track prep sucked so maybe ballast. I never asked )
I made it to Beech Bend the track was miserable so were the temps. Even there, the car went 179 and ran in the 7's Ask GTOGeorge and others how nice the track and weather wasnt.

Heads off... I was wrong. I found out several days after posting. Should have posted an apology and correction then. Looking back I cant really say what gave me the impression I had. Brian and others...sorry about that.

Ok Whose E heads were used on the DF dyno test if they werent Gaby's?
I've never said EIC, just Gaby, so dont add words I didnt say. If Im wrong show me who's they were and I'll admit misinformation.

For the record I've been a fan of Kinsler since I met him at a RAM race in Virginia. 2009 IIRC. Dont think I've met Cosgrove, havent followed him. Both fast cars.
Dont see your point of dragging them in when thread is about Fulton and Little Jack.
Dick seems far from being fully sorted so you cant say it cant do better. Current results look promising. Only car I've criticized is little jack. And thats largely due to him running his mouth.

Lastly paul I dont just sit around and make things up. I try to post what I know is true vs believe to be true. I post an opinion I usually preface it with IMO. There is no one here who never erred or had wrong info or simply confused something said with something else said.

Glad you got around to name names vs guessing games of who your referring too.

How about you just post from knowledge you have gained from your own personal hands on experience. Then your facts will be truths...and probably a lot shorter.

[Anderson Port Development]

[QUOTE=PAUL K;5632844][QUOTE=BruceWilkie;5632763]

Originally Posted by PAUL K

How about you just post from knowledge you have gained drom your own personal hands on experience. Then your facts will be truths...and probably a lot shorter.

... When Bruce speaks about CV-1 stuff, like Fulton's car, it's after he's spoken directly to me, he just mixed up a few details, not a big deal, and once I reminded him, he posted a correction ...