Pontiac - Street No question too basic here!

          
View Poll Results: How old are you?
20-30 12 3.29%
30-40 33 9.04%
40-50 84 23.01%
50-60 143 39.18%
60-70 71 19.45%
70-80 21 5.75%
80-90 1 0.27%
90+ and a legend! 0 0%
Voters: 365. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-24-2017, 06:59 PM
MarkS57's Avatar
MarkS57 MarkS57 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Flemington, NJ
Posts: 612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by unruhjonny View Post
.

On the otherhand, the Feiro got lots of press - a great number of people remeber them, and they were even in period movies...
They do and sometime not for the right reasons. Engine fires. Very much overblown. I owned one of the first V6 GT's off the line in early 85. My first new car. It had some issues but man it did turn heads and it was ball to drive (4 spd). I prefer to remember them as another Pontiac Pirate Ship victory, raise the Jolly Roger- damn the torpedoes! full speed ahead! Ha! In your eye 'chebby! Just sayin'...

__________________

65 Tempest, 400, TH400
86 Fiero SE 2.8
  #2  
Old 02-24-2017, 08:08 PM
Sirrotica's Avatar
Sirrotica Sirrotica is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Catawba Ohio
Posts: 7,554
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkS57 View Post
They do and sometime not for the right reasons. Engine fires. Very much overblown. I owned one of the first V6 GT's off the line in early 85. My first new car. It had some issues but man it did turn heads and it was ball to drive (4 spd). I prefer to remember them as another Pontiac Pirate Ship victory, raise the Jolly Roger- damn the torpedoes! full speed ahead! Ha! In your eye 'chebby! Just sayin'...
The 4 cylinders were the ones that had engine fires, not the V6s.

Quote:
Engine fire reputation

Of the total production of the Pontiac Fiero of 370,168,[1] 135 (.036%) of them were reported to have had engine fires, 122 of these occurred while driving, according to the NHTSA.

The engine fires almost exclusively pertained to the 1984 model year. Later model years were produced with upgraded equipment, and frequency of engine fire was significantly reduced.[citation needed]

According to AutoWeeks publication of Fiero firing squad, on October 6, 1983 a Pontiac engineer wrote an urgent memo to report that two Fieros had suddenly caught fire during test drives. This was only 3 months after the production of the Fiero began at the Pontiac plant. It was thought to be caused by antifreeze leaking out of badly installed hoses but in reality it was defective connecting rods. After one meeting with the Saginaw foundry manager, he wrote that “…60 percent to 90 percent of the rods produced do not exhibit defects.” This means at least every 1 out of 10 rods produced were defective and possibly 4 out of 10 were also defective. The Associated Press quoted the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration as saying it had "...received 148 complaints regarding Pontiac Fieros catching fire including reports of six injuries.... Low levels of engine oil may cause a connecting rod to break, allowing oil to escape and come into contact with engine parts. The oil would catch fire when it contacted the exhaust manifold or hot exhaust components.... David Hudgens, a GM spokesman in Detroit... said, 'If you ran out of oil, and then that coupled with some aggressive driving, perhaps, and maybe not changing the oil very often, you end up with a broken rod, and that's where the connecting rod came in; it is still the owner's responsibility to check the oil.' "[17]

The Pontiac division claimed in a 1988 press release that "GM tests have shown that running these 1984 cars with low engine oil level can cause connecting rod failure which may lead to an engine compartment fire.... Pontiac is aware of 260 fires attributable to the condition, along with ten reported minor injuries."[18]

The larger of the two reported numbers of cars with fires (260) amounts to 0.07% of Fiero models produced. The fires affected the 2.5 L engine almost exclusively, and mostly 1984 models (although there may have been additional occurrences after the above reports were published).

There are several possible contributors to Fiero engines catching fire. The primary cause is thought to be a batch of poorly cast connecting rods, produced in GM's Saginaw plant, which failed when the oil level became too low. One theory is that the sports car styling attracted buyers who would drive the car hard, most notably by excessively revving the engine. Another factor was the incorrectly listed three-quart oil capacity; the actual oil capacity is 4.5 quarts, but a misprint on the dipstick and in the owner's manual resulted in owners using only three quarts, any leakage or consumption would allow the oil level to decline over time to a dangerously low level. If the proper oil level was not maintained, the bearings could seize, snapping the porous castings of the connecting rods. This could result in a hole being punched in the engine block, allowing oil to spray onto hot exhaust components where it could ignite.

Alternatively, some fires may have been because of the engine wiring harness bulkhead connector (C500) being located in the center of the engine bay above the exhaust manifold, where heat could possibly melt and ignite the wiring. The 1984 model had a magnesium grille over this area. In later models, the main engine harness connector (C500) was moved to the battery area, and was improved to some degree with better heat shielding wrapped around the wiring harness.

A third cause might be cracks in the engine block from overtightening the head bolts. Some engines developed cracks in the block that would leak coolant and/or oil, sometimes accompanied by broken head bolts directly above the crack. The leak would spray coolant or oil, the latter resulting in fire if sprayed onto the hot catalytic converter or exhaust manifold at the front of the engine compartment.

Most vehicles existing today have been serviced by GM during one of the safety recalls on the car.[citation needed] For the fire-related recall, shields and drip-trays were added to prevent leaking fluids from contacting hot surfaces. The presence of drip shields between the engine block and the exhaust manifold are a clue that the car has been retrofitted. The addition of the longer AC Delco PF51 oil filter and a re-calibrated dipstick added extra oil capacity to the oiling system, and enabled running four quarts of oil in the crankcase instead of three, to help prevent oil starvation to the rods. Certain vehicles also had their connecting rods or entire block replaced.

Any fires that happen today would most likely not be caused by the aforementioned causes, but instead due to faulty repairs and failure of engine components, wiring, etc. due to age.[citation needed]
I owned an 86 SE 4 cylinder automatic 4 cyl. (daughters first car), tons of people asking WTF I would buy her an unsafe car like a Fiero. Maybe because the Fiero was actually quite a safe car with the passenger compartment surrounded by a full cage structure, if they bothered to look at the design of the car, instead of listening to idiots that don't have a clue. My own 88 was a 4 cyl. 5 speed. Put tons of miles on both of them. The timing gears went out of my 88 at about 130,000, fixed it and kept driving it until I sold it at around 155,000.

__________________
Brad Yost
1973 T/A (SOLD)
2005 GTO
1984 Grand Prix

100% Pontiacs in my driveway!!! What's in your driveway?

If you don't take some of the RACETRACK home with you, Ya got cheated


Last edited by Sirrotica; 02-24-2017 at 08:17 PM.
  #3  
Old 02-25-2017, 12:01 PM
goatwgn goatwgn is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chesapeake Va.
Posts: 1,394
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirrotica View Post
The 4 cylinders were the ones that had engine fires, not the V6s.



I owned an 86 SE 4 cylinder automatic 4 cyl. (daughters first car), tons of people asking WTF I would buy her an unsafe car like a Fiero. Maybe because the Fiero was actually quite a safe car with the passenger compartment surrounded by a full cage structure, if they bothered to look at the design of the car, instead of listening to idiots that don't have a clue. My own 88 was a 4 cyl. 5 speed. Put tons of miles on both of them. The timing gears went out of my 88 at about 130,000, fixed it and kept driving it until I sold it at around 155,000.
They were good little cars. Especially considering that GM corporate practically tied Pontiac Divisions' hands behind their back when designing it. There is a lot of misinformation out there over the years such as what you have mentioned regarding a lot of different things. Reminds me of the Corvair nonsense.

  #4  
Old 02-27-2017, 12:18 PM
Keith Seymore's Avatar
Keith Seymore Keith Seymore is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Motor City
Posts: 8,509
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirrotica View Post
Maybe because the Fiero was actually quite a safe car with the passenger compartment surrounded by a full cage structure,
My dad designed the frame for what would have been the 2nd generation Fiero (the "P2") while he was in Advanced Manufacturing Engineering for CPC.

It was an aluminum spaceframe construction adhesively bonded together.

It was the first frame within General Motors to pass the durability test on the first try (it broke the shaker).

K

__________________
'63 LeMans Convertible
'63 Grand Prix
'65 GTO - original, unrestored, Dad was original owner, 5000 original mile Royal Pontiac factory racer
'74 Chevelle - original owner, 9.56 @ 139 mph besthttp://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/
My Pontiac Story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524
"Intro from an old Assembly Plant Guy":http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926
  #5  
Old 02-27-2017, 01:41 PM
johnta1's Avatar
johnta1 johnta1 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: now sunny Florida!
Posts: 22,516
Default

Why skip the 80 to 90 age group (actually 80-89)?



Happy Birthday to Jim Hand!!!

84 years young.



BTW, the groups should have been like 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, etc.


__________________
John Wallace - johnta1
Pontiac Power RULES !!!
www.wallaceracing.com

Winner of Top Class at Pontiac Nationals, 2004 Cordova
Winner of Quick 16 At Ames 2004 Pontiac Tripower Nats

KRE's MR-1 - 1st 5 second Pontiac block ever!

W.E.C moment


"Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts."

"People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid." – Socrates
  #6  
Old 02-28-2017, 01:09 PM
MarkS57's Avatar
MarkS57 MarkS57 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Flemington, NJ
Posts: 612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Seymore View Post
My dad designed the frame for what would have been the 2nd generation Fiero (the "P2") while he was in Advanced Manufacturing Engineering for CPC.

It was an aluminum spaceframe construction adhesively bonded together.

It was the first frame within General Motors to pass the durability test on the first try (it broke the shaker).

K
That's cool; what might have been- aarrrgg!!

In the Fiero community, the big deal is engine swaps. Supercharged 3800's (L67) are very popular and make for a pretty quick little car. I myself was toying with a Buick 3.8 GN set up. To my knowledge, no one has tried a longitudinal Pontiac V8 swap yet!

__________________

65 Tempest, 400, TH400
86 Fiero SE 2.8
  #7  
Old 02-28-2017, 01:50 PM
RocktimusPryme's Avatar
RocktimusPryme RocktimusPryme is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bedford, IN
Posts: 2,595
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkS57 View Post
That's cool; what might have been- aarrrgg!!

In the Fiero community, the big deal is engine swaps. Supercharged 3800's (L67) are very popular and make for a pretty quick little car. I myself was toying with a Buick 3.8 GN set up. To my knowledge, no one has tried a longitudinal Pontiac V8 swap yet!
Im fairly certain I saw a 455 in one years ago. But it didnt fit all that well, I think he ran it without the hatch.

I actually almost did that SC 3800 swap. I even went so far as to secure an engine that was a target of opportunity. Problem I ran into was when I tried to buy a Fiero. The only ones I liked were the GT models in the last couple years or production. And people are pretty proud of those price wise.

From what I read it was a pretty easy swap.

__________________
1967 Firebird 462 580hp/590ftlbs
1962 Pontiac Catalina Safari Swapped in Turd of an Olds 455
Owner/Creator Catfish Motorsports
https://www.youtube.com/@CatfishMotorsports
  #8  
Old 02-28-2017, 03:51 PM
unruhjonny's Avatar
unruhjonny unruhjonny is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 6,835
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RocktimusPryme View Post
Im fairly certain I saw a 455 in one years ago. But it didnt fit all that well, I think he ran it without the hatch.

I actually almost did that SC 3800 swap. I even went so far as to secure an engine that was a target of opportunity. Problem I ran into was when I tried to buy a Fiero. The only ones I liked were the GT models in the last couple years or production. And people are pretty proud of those price wise.

From what I read it was a pretty easy swap.
HPP had a geeat article on one.

I personally prefer the Quad4HO swap - but I am admittedly bias.
Putting a Quad4 in a Fiero in either LO or HO trim would be lighter than either original engine, and have more hp to boot!

I had actually read that the Quad4 was slated to replace the Iron duke for 1990 Fieros... that would have been a game changer (at least until the automotive press whould have given the Quad4 a bad rap for the OE head gasket issues)...

https://youtu.be/uzHjPuB-7N4
(in the video you can spy my '73 Firebird parked infront of the Grand Am.)

__________________
1970 Formula 400
Carousel Red paint on Black standard interior
A no-engine, no-transmission, no-wheel option car.
Quite likely one of few '70 Muncie three speed Formula 400's left.


1991 Grand Am: 14.4 @ 93.7mph (DA corrected) (retired DD, stock appearing)
2009 Cobalt SS: 13.9 @ 103mph (current DD; makes something north of 300hp & 350ft/lbs)

Last edited by unruhjonny; 02-28-2017 at 03:58 PM.
  #9  
Old 03-01-2017, 01:11 AM
Blued and Painted's Avatar
Blued and Painted Blued and Painted is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Granby Colorado
Posts: 2,431
Default

The Quad 4 is good if you can keep the head gaskets from blowing and the timing chain on the sprockets. JMO.
The problematic water pump was normally the culprit for both.

__________________
Bull Nose Formula-461, 6x-4, Q-jet, HEI, TH400, 8.5 3.08, superslowjunk

Last edited by Blued and Painted; 03-01-2017 at 01:55 AM.
  #10  
Old 02-28-2017, 02:36 PM
pontibeast's Avatar
pontibeast pontibeast is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Blue Ridge Mountains, VA
Posts: 653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkS57 View Post
That's cool; what might have been- aarrrgg!!

In the Fiero community, the big deal is engine swaps. Supercharged 3800's (L67) are very popular and make for a pretty quick little car. I myself was toying with a Buick 3.8 GN set up. To my knowledge, no one has tried a longitudinal Pontiac V8 swap yet!
One of the Pontiac guys over on Yellow Bullet has a Fiero with a big block chevy in it. Haven't seen pics but I have heard it's pretty fast.

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017