#1  
Old 02-28-2017, 05:13 PM
eaglesan13 eaglesan13 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 2,648
Default

What about non-a/c cars. The battery, alternator, power steering, and starter are all on the drivers side. I have the engine and trans out of the 71 right now, and it sits noticeably higher on the drivers side.

Quote:
Originally Posted by njsteve View Post
I was thinking (always a dangerous endeavor)...it's probably all the A/C gear that causes these things to sit lower on the passenger side. You have that heavy A-6 compressor, the evaporator and fiberglass box, and all the hoses and extraneous other shrapnel that go along with the system. Not to mention the heavy radial spare tire and rim on the right side as well. All that would tend to make the car unevenly weighted to the right side.

  #2  
Old 02-28-2017, 05:57 PM
Scarebird's Avatar
Scarebird Scarebird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Moita, Portugal
Posts: 5,387
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eaglesan13 View Post
What about non-a/c cars. The battery, alternator, power steering, and starter are all on the drivers side...
One thing I always thought Chevy did better, putting all that heavy stuff on the passenger side.

  #3  
Old 02-28-2017, 08:07 PM
njsteve's Avatar
njsteve njsteve is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,051
Default

Maybe the bodies get torque-twisted over the years? I know when I had Mopars, several of them (440 and Hemi powered Cudas and Chargers) had cracks in the rear, passenger side floor where the twist caused a split in the same place in each car.

Is your spare tire out of the trunk?

  #4  
Old 02-28-2017, 09:23 PM
vitamin c vitamin c is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Holland,Mi.
Posts: 202
Default

njsteve,
After recently doing the same rebuild to my 74 SD, I'm faced with the same problem of the left front being considerably higher, like 3/4 inch. After the front and rear springs were replaced I noticed the lean from behind the car and have traced it to the driver front spring. I used replacements #cs5402 from Classic and noticed right away they don't have the same tapered (flat) top coils as the originals. They look identical top to bottom, but they paint a white mark on one end and call that the "top" of the spring, and install "up". What I'm noticing is the driver spring is not sitting vertical in the frame spring pocket. The passenger side installed perfect and sits centered and vertical. Saturday I'm pulling the left front back apart to find the problem. My guess is that the sprint "top" is not siting in the correct groove in the frame. I used a bore scope to see up into the frame and see the spring doesn't look right. I'm assuming that the round replacement coils don't sit correct in the frame as original.

  #5  
Old 02-28-2017, 09:32 PM
njsteve's Avatar
njsteve njsteve is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,051
Default

That is one of the problems with the generic one application-fits-all springs from places like Classic Industries. While not ground to a taper, the company that built my springs bends the lowest section of the coil so that it is touching the next coil at it's tip. The top is regular coil like the original spring. This way the bottom can sit into the pocket in the lower control arm. The upper locating area in the subframe has a circular cage that the spring locates around. I don't think the upper can be out of its spot without major problems in getting the spring to fit into the area. It's kind of a go or no-go situation at the top. Yuo may have the spring siting half on that circular cage, causing the upset height.

  #6  
Old 02-28-2017, 09:59 PM
vitamin c vitamin c is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Holland,Mi.
Posts: 202
Default

I agree with the go, no-go installation , but something isn't right as far as I can tell. without the "flat" upper coil, its causing coil bind of sorts. I can see the spring is in its correct location, but I cant tell until I remove it to confirm. I may go through a lot of work to find there is nothing I can do, but the lean is driving me nuts

  #7  
Old 02-28-2017, 10:04 PM
njsteve's Avatar
njsteve njsteve is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,051
Default

Is the bottom coil end sitting in the "pocket" in the control arm? The easy way to check is to insert a drill bit into one of those two small holes. If the drill bit doesn't immediately touch the bottom coil through that hole (and instead has a 1/2" movement upward) then the coil is not in the pocket and needs to be rotated counter clockwise and reset.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	pocket.jpg
Views:	279
Size:	69.4 KB
ID:	448501  

  #8  
Old 02-28-2017, 10:13 PM
vitamin c vitamin c is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Holland,Mi.
Posts: 202
Default

yes, the bottom sits nicely in the pocket of the control arm. I cleaned and painted mine identical to yours, so no crud or rust causing an issue. The bore scope camera shows the top coil not sitting real level, but its very hard to see what the actual issue is (if there even is one). ill report back after this weekend and let you know what I found.

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:25 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017