#1  
Old 11-30-2017, 08:23 AM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,302
Default

Billy, they did a really nice job on that "Bottom Feed" Intake. Whole package should be "Bad to the Bone". What Kind of times was the car running?

Tom V.

ps Charlie, We did testing on the "Slot" on a Audi Manifold designed in production with the slot.
The Audi intake was adapted to our 4 cylinder engine. Mixed results (if it did anything better, it did not show up on the dyno) vs the simple "bottom feed bounce off the roof" design by Mahovitz.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	14-manifold_3d_new__exh_4.jpg
Views:	322
Size:	145.9 KB
ID:	468996   Click image for larger version

Name:	Audi Slot Manifold.jpg
Views:	375
Size:	38.0 KB
ID:	468999   Click image for larger version

Name:	Auto Cad Image AUDI Intake Design.jpg
Views:	391
Size:	42.5 KB
ID:	469000  

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #2  
Old 11-30-2017, 04:52 PM
charlie66's Avatar
charlie66 charlie66 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Vaught View Post
Billy, they did a really nice job on that "Bottom Feed" Intake. Whole package should be "Bad to the Bone". What Kind of times was the car running?

Tom V.

ps Charlie, We did testing on the "Slot" on a Audi Manifold designed in production with the slot.
The Audi intake was adapted to our 4 cylinder engine. Mixed results (if it did anything better, it did not show up on the dyno) vs the simple "bottom feed bounce off the roof" design by Mahovitz.
Thanks Tom. I like the second picture . Would like to know more about that one..

__________________
My Half AN Injun.....
  #3  
Old 11-30-2017, 06:24 PM
Tom Vaught's Avatar
Tom Vaught Tom Vaught is offline
Boost Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The United States of America
Posts: 31,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by charlie66 View Post
Thanks Tom. I like the second picture . Would like to know more about that one..
As you can see the air went into the throttle body and then into a large plenum.
The second plenum is where the Intake Runners feed the engine. It is a large plenum too.

The slot would be between the 1st plenum and the second plenum. It would be clocked to point about 5:00 and go into the second plenum, Air would go thru the slot, bank off the roof of the second plenum, then the air would continue on to the runners at a much lower velocity and higher density.

I lot of monkey motion trying th kill the air from all packing up at the rear of the first plenum.

Center feed, bank off the roof, seems to work the best and uses only one plenum.

Tom V.

__________________
"Engineers do stuff for reasons" Tom Vaught

Despite small distractions, there are those who will go Forward, Learning, Sharing Knowledge, Doing what they can to help others move forward.
  #4  
Old 11-30-2017, 07:51 PM
charlie66's Avatar
charlie66 charlie66 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Vaught View Post
As you can see the air went into the throttle body and then into a large plenum.
The second plenum is where the Intake Runners feed the engine. It is a large plenum too.

The slot would be between the 1st plenum and the second plenum. It would be clocked to point about 5:00 and go into the second plenum, Air would go thru the slot, bank off the roof of the second plenum, then the air would continue on to the runners at a much lower velocity and higher density.

I lot of monkey motion trying th kill the air from all packing up at the rear of the first plenum.

Center feed, bank off the roof, seems to work the best and uses only one plenum.

Tom V.
Ok , so what are your thoughts on this design Tom?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXW_W5Sh47U

__________________
My Half AN Injun.....
  #5  
Old 01-09-2018, 06:02 PM
68azbird 68azbird is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: AZ
Posts: 739
Default

How's this work out by splitting off right at the throttle body to feed both sides ?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20180109_145632.jpg
Views:	308
Size:	95.5 KB
ID:	472116   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_20180109_145552.jpg
Views:	283
Size:	266.6 KB
ID:	472117  

__________________
It is easier to fool a man than it is to convince he has been fooled
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:00 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017