| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Seems plausible.... Except for the part about Iowa |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
LOL.. that's funny!
Glad to hear the hear this was FINALLY figured out. Hopefully this will get resolved where everybody is satisfied because life is too short... I would be willing to donate $20.00 towards some beer... and a smokey burnout!!
__________________
'71 GTO, 406 CID, 60916, 1.65 HS, '69 #46 Heads 230CFM, 800CFM Q-jet, TH400, 12 Bolt 3.55 '72 Lemans, Lucerne Blue, WU2, T41, L78, M22, G80 |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Paul, In my attempted explanation of what caused a piston skirt to collapse, I didn't know anything about something getting into the #5 cylinder. That could have been in the nearly 1400 posts somewhere, but I missed it. I also thought the bearing failure somewhere along the line was more serious and since I know you like a tight quench, I could see the piston contacting the head in a failure situation and collapsing a skirt. Your explanation makes just as much sense and you were there! When I began building engines decades ago, pistons came in a box with the nominal size on the box only, not actual measured sizes. It was up to the builder 100% to measure each piston in several places, do all kinds of math and averages and either hone each cylinder to the piston or hone to an average. Cast pistons were usually +- .0015 through a set and forged .003. As you know even today, forged custom pistons are still kind of all over the map. It's very unfortunate you guys and the engine owner got bit by this series of events. There are always a few rock throwers, experts chiming in from the sidelines as other's struggle. It's just more public with the internet and message boards. I doubt very seriously you would be in business for decades and have a reputation where people are willing to send their engines from all over the country to have your shop work on them. So to implicate that without a public forum you would have washed your hands of this engine is unfair IMO. Again, WE ALL MAKE MISTAKES. The shop I have worked out of for 30 years 5 years ago had 8 of the 10 top qualifiers in NHRA Stock and Super Stock at the US Nationals and is a builder of Australian Pro Stock engines they ship back and forth all year. 2 man shop. Mistakes are still made, few and far between. When they happen, just like this Pontiac, the problem is eventually found and corrected.
One of the worst I had happen that relates to this Pontiac, happened on the dyno. We had the jam nut that holds the air temperature sensor in the Superflow air hat vibrate loose and fall through the carburetor of a new engine on it's 3rd. or 4th pull. It bounced all through the engine, breaking 2 sleeves, bending valves and cracked a head. Lots of time and money lost because of a small jam nut. It was about the size of a car radio stem nut. Personally, this whole drama should do more positive good for your business in the long run. If I didn't do all my own work, your shop would be on my short list. Take care. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
So glad you set that straight Paul, and for doing all that you did. It shows what kind of guy you really are and the stand up work you guys do at the shop. I am however disappointed just as you are Paul at the forum here and several people in particular that threw you under the bus without knowing really any of the back story and what you've done to this point, let alone know who you are as a person and what you guys stand for. That is uncalled for and unfortunate, but not surprising.
This whole deal unfolding on the forum here should do nothing but encourage people to deal with Paul, and my self and others I know that have first hand experience with Paul will continue to support Paul with business as usual. Excellent work Paul, you went above and beyond what most any other shop would do that I've had experience with. ![]() Now get out there and enjoy that engine Joe. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I think anyone in their right mind could agree the root cause should have been remedied when the owner paid the long distance shipping bill back and then the second dyno. The pistons were removed from their bores? If not, why not? |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
So, I'm going to have to go through this whole thread to see who guessed the piston slap first so we can determine the winner. I will send the winner a Pontiac sign like I said I would. Hell, I'll even throw in some local Virginia beer. Hopefully we can all agree on the winner! Hahahaha!
I do have a question though. There seems to be some confusion if the bearing spun or not when it failed on the dyno. After reading the recent post, I do remember that it was discussed about the spun bearing. Has anyone heard of a piston skirt collapsing when a bearing is spun? Is that normal? What happens when a bearing is spun that could or would cause the piston to hit the head. Is that even possible? Considering that the knocking noise has been the same since when I first received the motor and stopped when that one piston was replaced, I would just like to get a better understanding of what happens when you have a spun bearing. Last edited by Va68goat; 09-23-2019 at 09:19 PM. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
As far as collateral damage from a spun bearing, that's a theoretical debate that could keep this thread going forever. When a rod bearing spins inside the connecting rod, it rapidly self destructs due to friction and heat. During normal operation, the inside diameter of the rod's big end clamps the bearing halves in place (bearing crush). When bearing crush is lost for whatever reason, the inserts will spin inside the rod's big end. Loss of lubrication will also cause a spun bearing, when the friction wanting to turn the bearing insert overcomes the bearing crush keeping it stationary in the rod. Usually it makes a hell of a racket and the damage is limited to the rod and the crankshaft, unless the rod comes apart (thrown rod). Since this engine didn't throw a rod, the rod bearing would have had to do one of two things to damage a piston: 1: Rod bearing is destroyed enough that the excess slack between rod's big end and crank journal allows piston to hit the head during TDC. That would have left witness marks on chamber and top of piston. Should result in damaged piston crown and pinched #1 ring land. 2: Rod bearing gets hot enough to friction weld itself between crank and big end of rod. Rod is then effectively welded to crankshaft. Rod tries to whip around with crank, restrained only by piston. The piston is damaged from the abnormal forces. However, this typically tears the rod cap off or breaks the rod, resulting in total carnage. Motor would have had to be shut down just before it chucks a rod across the room, to damage a piston like this but not chuck a rod.
__________________
I could explain all this to the girl at the parts store, but she'd probably call the asylum. White '67 LeMans 407/TH350/Ford 3.89... RIP Red '67 LeMans. 407/TH400/Ford 3.25 Last edited by chiphead; 09-24-2019 at 10:07 AM. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
“It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance.” Dr. Thomas Sowell |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've followed this thread..great thread with a great end. Finally!
__________________
466 Mike Voycey shortblock, 310cfm SD KRE heads, SD "OF 2.0 cam", torker 2,generic one inch open spacer 373 gears 3200 Continental Convertor best et 10.679/127.5/1.533 60ft 308 gears best et 10.76/125.64/1.5471 |
| Closed Thread |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|