#1  
Old 12-23-2019, 11:21 AM
242177P's Avatar
242177P 242177P is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,873
Default

I'd like to think that one could successfully argue that they borrowed some stuff from Pontiac's playbook when they created the LS1. The SBC had a 23 degree valve inclination, the new motor used 15 (Pontiac went with 14 back in 1967).

SBC ---> 4.00 x 3.48
LS1 ----> 3.898 x 3.622
350P ---> 3.875 x 3.75

Well, that *could* just be a coincidence.
So let's look at the 427.

BBC ---> 4.25 x 3.76
LS7 ----> 4.12 x 4.00
428P ---> 4.12 x 4.00

I'd like to see what a baby roller would do in a 350P. A well thought out grind would yield respectable mileage numbers and really breathe some life into it. That, IMO, is the biggest advantage the LS has. Yeah, they've got big flow numbers, but the cam is key. Imagine how much they'd suffer if they were forced to use a HFT with 1.5 rockers.

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:20 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017