#1  
Old 07-25-2020, 10:44 PM
1oldgoat's Avatar
1oldgoat 1oldgoat is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Wellington, Colorado
Posts: 701
Default

I don’t know why they came up sideways. But hopefully they are what you need.

__________________
68 GTO Ram Air I Auto, Starlight Black/Teal-Survivor
68 Firebird Ram Air II 4spd, Aegena Blue/Black/Black
68 Firebird 400 Conv. Auto, Red/Parchment/Parchment
69 Firebird Ram Air IV, 4spd Matador Red/Black-Survivor
71 GTO 455HO 4spd, Lucerne Blue/Black/Black
71 GTO 455HO Auto, Lucerne Blue/Sandalwood/Blue
  #2  
Old 07-25-2020, 11:53 PM
Mcronk Mcronk is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 377
Default

Thanks Scott. What you shared is the routing for non RA II cars. Jim Mino and I discussed the dual vacuum distributors that were used in 68. He said those dual distributors were not used on the RA II cars. He recently sold a correct RA II distributor that he restored. He said he has had several and they all had the same date code. Of all the RA II cars he has had and seen the RA II parts were done in batches with date codes sometimes way in advance of invoice dates.

He told me the RA II cars only used 3 ports on the thermostatic switch. I have a engine shot of Jim Mattisons RA II car that he sold back in 2016 that clearly shows only 3 lines connected. Factory service manuals were written and printed long before the RA II cars were even considered for production and then built. However i would assume the 3 lines that were used would have the same colored stripes in the same position per the diagram. So that information does help. I attached a picture of the RA II distributor he restored and engine shot of Mattisons car.

It is interesting to note that one line from carb supplies vacuum to thermostatic switch, then 3 lines are routed back towards vaccum switch and distributor. However i can't tell the routing very well and connection to distributor. Also note that Mattisons car does not appear to have correct RA II exhaust manifold for passenger side. I also attached picture of correct RA II manifold for that side.
Thanks!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	P3314385.jpg
Views:	284
Size:	77.7 KB
ID:	545803   Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_2020-04-16-22-07-54.jpg
Views:	346
Size:	82.3 KB
ID:	545804   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4416.jpg
Views:	324
Size:	132.5 KB
ID:	545805  


Last edited by Mcronk; 07-26-2020 at 12:09 AM.
  #3  
Old 07-28-2020, 11:11 PM
Mcronk Mcronk is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 377
Default

Very nice. It will be top notch!

  #4  
Old 10-08-2020, 12:58 AM
Mcronk Mcronk is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 377
Default

Insurance is a double edged sword. It is expensive for high dollar cars but you gotta have it. I try and manage my costs because i have 4 collector car policies. I look at actual sale prices including auctions and private sales. Then i consider how much money i actually have in the car. Thats how i arrive at a value i feel comfortable with. The RA II cars don't change hands often so data is scarce. I did a search a while back and found the most recent sale results at the 2016 Barret auction. Jim Mattisons original #matching car (did not have correct exhaust manifolds) sold for $132k. Another very nicely restored RA II without original engine but correct codes sold for $110k. Both cars were professionally restored but not convertibles like yours. You can also look at the Hagerty value guide as it does provide values based on condition and body style. You can insure it for as much as you want within reason. As long as you want to pay higher premiums the insurance companies will oblige.

As for carb running out of fuel i had a similar problem when running my 67 GTO in Stock ET with the NMCA. Car would nose over hard at top of second gear (Turbo 400). I left small stock fuel line in place but ran a larger line right beside it up to stock mechanical pump. I also installed a Carter pusher pump back by the gas tank and hid the switch in the ash tray. If i make a full throttle run and forget to turn the pump on the car will nose over. With pump on it never skips a beat. Also helps fill carb for starting when car has set for a while and fuel has evaporated.

  #5  
Old 10-08-2020, 01:08 AM
PurelyGTO68 PurelyGTO68 is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mcronk View Post
Insurance is a double edged sword. It is expensive for high dollar cars but you gotta have it. I try and manage my costs because i have 4 collector car policies. I look at actual sale prices including auctions and private sales. Then i consider how much money i actually have in the car. Thats how i arrive at a value i feel comfortable with. The RA II cars don't change hands often so data is scarce. I did a search a while back and found the most recent sale results at the 2016 Barret auction. Jim Mattisons original #matching car (did not have correct exhaust manifolds) sold for $132k. Another very nicely restored RA II without original engine but correct codes sold for $110k. Both cars were professionally restored but not convertibles like yours. You can also look at the Hagerty value guide as it does provide values based on condition and body style. You can insure it for as much as you want within reason. As long as you want to pay higher premiums the insurance companies will oblige.

As for carb running out of fuel i had a similar problem when running my 67 GTO in Stock ET with the NMCA. Car would nose over hard at top of second gear (Turbo 400). I left small stock fuel line in place but ran a larger line right beside it up to stock mechanical pump. I also installed a Carter pusher pump back by the gas tank and hid the switch in the ash tray. If i make a full throttle run and forget to turn the pump on the car will nose over. With pump on it never skips a beat. Also helps fill carb for starting when car has set for a while and fuel has evaporated.
Thanks for the reply. I plan on checking Hagerty in the morning. Last I checked a convertible in top condition was $140k then add 15% for manual trans it says. So $161k but my car doesn't have the original engine so deduct 20% I figure is about right.....so maybe $130k.

Only 5 convertibles known remain.....so that is a bit of a wildcard. Frame has partial VIN and axle is original and proper date code so that helps in some people's minds.

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:16 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017