| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I believe there is at least a 10-15 RWHP reduction going from DynoMax UltraFlo's to the SuperTurbo's, and another 10-15 hp reduction going to the factory (Waldron/Gardner) mufflers. It would be an interesting test. Dennis |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Regards, "455HO" Lloyd 2008 GMC Sierra Denali 2WD Crew, L92 6L80E, Silver w/ Ebony guts, 14.26 @ 98 |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hmm...come to think of it, I have a pair of new (probably close to 15 years old now!) in the box 20" DynoMax SuperTurbo mufflers (17749) that are 9 3/4" x 4 1/4" ovals by 20" case length. The UltraFlo's have the same oval dimensions, just a shorter 18" case. I read that the Dynomax SuperTurbo's can support up to 700 cfm and the UltraFlo's up to 2000 cfm. That gives you an idea of the restriction built into the Turbo muffler "S" shaped flow path vs. the straight through of the UltraFlo. I'm quite sure there would be a performance penalty changing to Super Turbos's. I plan on using the 17749 mufflers on my '71 Bonneville (stock 455 4-bbl) when I upgrade from the teenie 2" system with Midas choker mufflers that is on there now.
Thanks for the compliments Lloyd! Dennis |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Finally got the correct black air cleaner lid to replace the old beat up chrome lid on it temporarily. Now it looks like what a 330 hp 400 should in a Tempest/LeMans.
Dennis |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|