#1  
Old 02-28-2021, 10:01 PM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 11,922
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Formulas View Post
One thing that caught my mind is

Doesn't the LSX engines operate with less spring pressure's than race Pontiacs?
They operate with less spring pressure than a "street" Pontiac in stock form!!

For starters, The very low mile LS engines I've done camshaft swaps in have stock beehive springs in them that were lucky to check just over 90 lbs. seat pressure, which is why those rollers live a long happy life. You can't even successfully run a decent flat tappet camshaft in a Pontiac with those springs pressures. So we don't even have to talk about race engines here.

When upgrading the camshafts in them years back, we went straight for a double spring with about 130 lbs. on the seat. The valvetrain in the LS engines are much lighter than Pontiacs, so they work well with a little less spring pressures on aftermarket camshafts than what you would typically see today, especially in engines with heavier valvetrains. I've run those engines like that for another 80,000 miles with the original lifters still in place without a problem, and spin them near 7000 rpm.
In a Pontiac with a pretty heavy valve train you are looking at 150 lbs. on the seat and somewhere around 360-380 open on a fairly mild hydraulic roller to control the valvetrain, even at lower 5-6000 rpm levels. I've had no issues with this either. My BBC has been together for the last 20 years with those springs without failure.

__________________
2019 Pontiac Heaven class winner

https://youtu.be/XqEydRRRwqE

Last edited by Formulajones; 02-28-2021 at 10:07 PM.
  #2  
Old 03-04-2021, 12:13 AM
blueghoast's Avatar
blueghoast blueghoast is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,613
Default

So how ya keep them from spining?

GT.

  #3  
Old 03-15-2021, 01:02 AM
krisr's Avatar
krisr krisr is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sydney, OZ
Posts: 1,480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Formulajones View Post
The valvetrain in the LS engines are much lighter than Pontiacs, so they work well with a little less spring pressures on aftermarket camshafts than what you would typically see today, especially in engines with heavier valvetrains.
When I had my LS3 apart to do a valve spring and camshaft swap, I weighed the intake valves to compare against my 2.11 stainless valves.

Stock LS3 - 88 grams
F6189 (machined down to 2.11 w/30deg seat)- 147 grams

And that's JUST the valve!

__________________
'71 Holden HQ Monaro - 3850lbs race weight, 400c/i - 11.4 @ 120
'66 Pontiac GTO - 389, 4 speed street cruiser
  #4  
Old 03-15-2021, 09:01 AM
Murf Murf is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: St. Marys Ks. U.S.A.
Posts: 1,509
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by krisr View Post
When I had my LS3 apart to do a valve spring and camshaft swap, I weighed the intake valves to compare against my 2.11 stainless valves.



Stock LS3 - 88 grams

F6189 (machined down to 2.11 w/30deg seat)- 147 grams



And that's JUST the valve!


Good info krisr! I have a couple questions for anyone that cares to reply.

1. Does the weight of the complete valvetrain affect the spring pressure required? I assume it does.

2. Would the use of beehive springs help fight the possibility of overloading the lifters & are there compatible beehives available?

3. Are there any relatively light 2.11 intake valves available at a somewhat reasonable price?

Thanks
Murf



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  #5  
Old 03-15-2021, 09:53 AM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 11,922
Default

Yes the weight of the valve train has a huge affect on spring pressures needed to control it.

On the beehive's, today there are many more options that work. Back when I was playing with them on LS engines there wasn't, so the go to solution then was a typical double spring swapped onto the LS engines. Beehive's have a few advantages though (smaller retainer being lighter is one of them) so if I could find a beehive spring package to work with a particular combo I was building today I'd go that direction.

Yes there are lighter valves than stock available. You could even get into hollow stem or sodium filled stuff (GM did this on some LS engines)
It just depends on how much money you want to spend. Personally I prefer to go with either titanium or tool steel retainers on all engine builds to lighten things up, and lighter valve assemblies when I can, even on a typical street engine build. Spring pressure will also be a result of how aggressive the lobe profile is. Even on a mild street engine build the valvetrain ends up being a somewhat spendy part of the build.

__________________
2019 Pontiac Heaven class winner

https://youtu.be/XqEydRRRwqE
  #6  
Old 03-15-2021, 09:52 AM
slowbird's Avatar
slowbird slowbird is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Montgomery, IL
Posts: 10,911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by krisr View Post
When I had my LS3 apart to do a valve spring and camshaft swap, I weighed the intake valves to compare against my 2.11 stainless valves.

Stock LS3 - 88 grams
F6189 (machined down to 2.11 w/30deg seat)- 147 grams

And that's JUST the valve!
I don't know the ls stuff that well, do they run titanium valves? What size valves are they?

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:11 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017