#1  
Old 06-12-2021, 08:03 PM
HoneyHush HoneyHush is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florence,Ky.
Posts: 246
Default

I have a set of 17’s in my pile. I cc’d them a couple of years ago and I’m almost positive that they were close to 74/75 but have a little bit of valve sink I believe. I can cc them again if you want so you don’t have to pull the heads off? I wouldn’t anyway for a question of 2 or 3 cc’s lol.

  #2  
Old 06-13-2021, 08:22 AM
Jay S's Avatar
Jay S Jay S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Nebraska City, Nebraska
Posts: 2,585
Default

Lol, I have kind of found it is a little late to provide much helpful advise on engine internals once the heads are bolted on..

I think I underestimated the power potential of a small valve head some. I got to thinking I remember Dennis Jenson ( SD455DJ) posted some dyno pulls for a 400 with small valve heads a while back. Pure stock type built, tight quench, upper 70s cc small valve head with 45* valve, summit 2801, 214/224 @.050” cam, log manifolds. 383 HP @5300 and 455 tq@3500. You can see there would be no need to jump up to the bigger 224/234 cam. FWIW..Personally, most my experience has shown heads with 45* valves can usually tolerate more compression than the 30* intake heads, especially on smaller valve set ups. If KRE did 45* seats, it will help the XE some. Hopefully the engine has the bigger cc’s than in the 70s.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	1DCF829B-073F-4540-A92D-309D4A1C4F58.jpg
Views:	345
Size:	65.9 KB
ID:	568123  


Last edited by Jay S; 06-13-2021 at 08:47 AM. Reason: Add
  #3  
Old 06-13-2021, 03:34 PM
llwta76 llwta76 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HoneyHush View Post
I have a set of 17’s in my pile. I cc’d them a couple of years ago and I’m almost positive that they were close to 74/75 but have a little bit of valve sink I believe. I can cc them again if you want so you don’t have to pull the heads off? I wouldn’t anyway for a question of 2 or 3 cc’s lol.
Generous offer! Thanks a lot! This engine is buttoned up and still on a engine stand. As far as the cam goes I think it will be fine being only a street cruiser( after all torque is what moves a vehicle driven on the street anyway) . It's the c.r. that needs to be established. Numbers from 72-83.5 cc is just too much of a guessing game. If comp ratio is in the high 9's then the cam simply needs to go. I need to get back to him and advise. What he does is up to him. I will certainly strongly advise him to pull a head and get a chamber cc'd. then go from there.

Thanks for all the responses, Larry

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:08 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017