| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would try it and see which works better for your car. I've pretty much ran them all. As with most engineering solutions, there's always trade-offs to be made. I think the Holley is easier to tune. I ran a Carter 625 on my 350 Chevelle daily driver for a while. It worked well after throwing the tuning kit at it. Was very lean out of the box. Also struggled to get a smooth secondary transition. After tuning it was a very good carb though.
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to JSchmitz For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would not waste time and funds to make any of them work properly.
I would sell them to the Chevy crowd and get a proper Pontiac Quadrajet intake and carb. JMHO |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Kenth For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Agreed! Before I understood what a terrifically versatile and capable carburetor the Q-Jet was, I mocked it. I ran a Holley 3310 for years without issue. However, when I finally went back to a properly jetted/metered Q-jet, the entire driving experience was improved.
__________________
'68 GTO 4-spd Hardtop (11) '68 GTO Convertible AT (1) '70 LeMans Sport Land of Lakes Muscle Car Classic Facebook Event Facebook Wall (Kurt Smith,Minneapolis) |
| The Following User Says Thank You to 68gtoMN For This Useful Post: | ||
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|