#1  
Old 01-18-2022, 01:52 PM
Verdoro 68's Avatar
Verdoro 68 Verdoro 68 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Clayton, CA
Posts: 3,066
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesster1977 View Post
Not familiar with "Oil Bypass Filters" , so I found a good article on how they work. Looks like a Truck (and Diesel thing), and wonder if anyone in the car world really uses something like this?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Formulajones View Post
Not really
LOL

I did a little homework last night and looked at various crank and stroker kits and searched through some old threads. It seems like the real benefit of a 471+ stroker comes in with a set of aluminum heads where you can keep the compression higher.

From what I've been reading,a -30cc dish is on the larger side, but shouldn't present any problems. Any advantage to splitting the difference with a 4" crank and building a 440 to keep the dish smaller? Is it a wash? I guess the compression ratio will be the same either way, just less cubes.

__________________
Ken
'68 GTO - 464 - Ram Air II heads - 236/242 roller - 9.5” TSP converter - Moser 3.55 Truetrac (build thread | walk around)
'74 Ventura 350
'69 AMC Javelin SST

Last edited by Verdoro 68; 01-18-2022 at 02:01 PM.
  #2  
Old 01-18-2022, 02:13 PM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 11,920
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Verdoro 68 View Post
LOL

I did a little homework last night and looked at various crank and stroker kits and searched through some old threads. It seems like the real benefit of a 471+ stroker comes in with a set of aluminum heads where you can keep the compression higher.

From what I've been reading,a -30cc dish is on the larger side, but shouldn't present any problems. Any advantage to splitting the difference with a 4" crank and building a 440 to keep the dish smaller? Is it a wash? I guess the compression ratio will be the same either way, just less cubes.
The amount of dish you need really isn't going to affect much of anything at these power levels. If I were choosing, since the rotating assemblies cost about the same, I'd go with at least a 4.250 setup and just tailor the compression to what ever you want with the piston design and run with it.

__________________
2019 Pontiac Heaven class winner

https://youtu.be/XqEydRRRwqE
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:49 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017