#21  
Old 03-01-2022, 06:58 PM
tom s tom s is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: long beach ca usa
Posts: 19,429
Default

I know you can’t on the Warrior,fix is sell it and get a Bathtub while they will be available.Shameless plug again.Tom

  #22  
Old 03-01-2022, 07:06 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 21,711
Default

The T-II will make the most power on your build, requires at least a 1" spacer and 850cfm carb. -My 455 is making somewhere around 5590575 HP with just a angled 3/8 spacer to get the Shaker level!

I'd kind of keep the 2x4 setup myself too! I would think there would be a progressive linkage that would work.

Back when I had sideways Holleys on my 409 all 8 bbls opened at the same time-but then gas was 0.30/gal

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune [email protected]
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
1964 Corvette Coupe 327 4 speed
  #23  
Old 03-01-2022, 07:14 PM
moneypit's Avatar
moneypit moneypit is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Marcos, Texas
Posts: 462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skip Fix View Post
The T-II will make the most power on your build, requires at least a 1" spacer and 850cfm carb. -My 455 is making somewhere around 5590575 HP with just a angled 3/8 spacer to get the Shaker level!

I'd kind of keep the 2x4 setup myself too! I would think there would be a progressive linkage that would work.

Back when I had sideways Holleys on my 409 all 8 bbls opened at the same time-but then gas was 0.30/gal
I think it's the lack of a plenum between the two carbs on the Warrior that prevents using progressive linkage.

__________________
37 Pontiac Sedan 455 700r4
94 Firehawk Supercharged 5.7 LT1 6spd.
71 GTO base 400 A/T
97 F250 7.3 turbo diesel
  #24  
Old 03-01-2022, 07:17 PM
moneypit's Avatar
moneypit moneypit is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Marcos, Texas
Posts: 462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott65 View Post
Very cool. Dual tbi would give you all the mileage and power there is in the combo. I did that on a Wenzler 2×4. Keeps the cool factor too.
Hey Scott, does the dual TBI set up require a progressive linkage to be used?

__________________
37 Pontiac Sedan 455 700r4
94 Firehawk Supercharged 5.7 LT1 6spd.
71 GTO base 400 A/T
97 F250 7.3 turbo diesel
  #25  
Old 03-01-2022, 07:19 PM
Scott65's Avatar
Scott65 Scott65 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,991
Default

No. You don't need it, it wouldn't have any benefit. My experience is with the FAST system. It ties them together 1 to 1 so that it only needs one tps.

__________________
'65 Tempest 467 3650# [email protected]
  #26  
Old 03-01-2022, 07:36 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 21,711
Default

Yea the tiny plenum connecting the two on a Warrior/Nash(I have one also) might not flow enough or have bad distribution issues. I always though using an Edelbrock upper plenum from a SBC/BBC intake might work better.

One day-a throw down spare motor to test my Warrior/Nash, M/T and that Bathtub when Tom gets them done on the dyno!

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune [email protected]
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
1964 Corvette Coupe 327 4 speed
  #27  
Old 03-01-2022, 07:47 PM
moneypit's Avatar
moneypit moneypit is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Marcos, Texas
Posts: 462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skip Fix View Post
Yea the tiny plenum connecting the two on a Warrior/Nash(I have one also) might not flow enough or have bad distribution issues. I always though using an Edelbrock upper plenum from a SBC/BBC intake might work better.

One day-a throw down spare motor to test my Warrior/Nash, M/T and that Bathtub when Tom gets them done on the dyno!
That would be awesome!

__________________
37 Pontiac Sedan 455 700r4
94 Firehawk Supercharged 5.7 LT1 6spd.
71 GTO base 400 A/T
97 F250 7.3 turbo diesel
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:29 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017