| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Eleven cubic inches plus a better cylinder head and valvetrain design.
The availability of pistons that are reasonably priced is a big advantage for the 400 engines, good 389 pistons are scarce and expensive in comparison.
__________________
1964 Tempest Coupe LS3/4L70E/3.42 1964 Le Mans Convertible 421 HO/TH350/3.08 2002 WS6 Convertible LS1/4L60E/3.23 1966 VW Type 2 Single Cab Pickup 140hp 2276 1956 VW Type 2 Panel Van 36hp 1200 1957 VW Type 1 Beetle 180hp 2276 |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
1963 and earlier 389 blocks wont hold the starter.
1964-66 389´s may be bored out to 400 std. 400´s is still plentiful, 389´s is not. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
65 and 66 389 have thin wall cast blocks, plus the connecting rods were strengthened in 1967 over 1966 by adding a rib on the big end next to the rod bolt.
Then there's what Bart said about the heads, and valvetrain being improved also. Unless you needed to have a 389 for class rules, I would go for a 400, hands down. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|