#1  
Old 04-27-2023, 12:37 PM
P@blo's Avatar
P@blo P@blo is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 1,743
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Formulajones View Post
Just an FYI for those reading, the weight of a link bar setup shouldn't even be a player in the grand scheme of things so long as the rest of the valvetrain is setup properly (IE: correct spring pressures) And with these low revving Pontiacs that people are typically building in here, it's really a non issue.
And another FYI for those reading. Shouldn’t or won’t? Posts keep popping up that might suggest shouldn’t.

I know, grease the wheels but there seems to be no magic retrofit bullet. And then the added cost…

  #2  
Old 04-27-2023, 01:17 PM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 11,928
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by P@blo View Post
And another FYI for those reading. Shouldn’t or won’t? Posts keep popping up that might suggest shouldn’t.

I know, grease the wheels but there seems to be no magic retrofit bullet. And then the added cost…
Won't

Most guys here don't even spin their Pontiacs above 5500, and many others don't make power much above that. It's the street section. With a proper spring valve train control is not an issue with these things.

If you want to save weight on the valvetrain then look at retainers and valves and don't worry about link bars.

__________________
2019 Pontiac Heaven class winner

https://youtu.be/XqEydRRRwqE
  #3  
Old 08-21-2023, 05:15 PM
Stan65 Stan65 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Toledo, IL
Posts: 347
Default

Singleton,

For the guy that wants to keep the "EGR" valley pan, there are no other hydraulic roller choices I am aware of. It would definitely be for the "mild" build setup.

It's just a spit ball idea. Not in it to make a business. It's just a hobby and I like a challenge.

Here's to the "you can't fit a finned aluminum timing cover under the water pump on a 409" so I made my own. It was marketed for a few years by a buddy until he retired. I have the knowledge and ability, and he had the CNC mill.

Thanks,
Stan
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	0823112001.jpg
Views:	338
Size:	62.6 KB
ID:	618565   Click image for larger version

Name:	0831111805.jpg
Views:	345
Size:	55.9 KB
ID:	618566   Click image for larger version

Name:	0909111509.jpg
Views:	297
Size:	66.6 KB
ID:	618567   Click image for larger version

Name:	0910111615.jpg
Views:	324
Size:	75.7 KB
ID:	618568   Click image for larger version

Name:	1124110814b.jpg
Views:	323
Size:	56.4 KB
ID:	618569  


The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Stan65 For This Useful Post:
  #4  
Old 08-21-2023, 05:18 PM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 11,928
Default

Any reason why you want to keep an EGR valley pan?

Just thinking out loud but it seems it would be easier and much cheaper to just modify the EGR pan to work with retro lifters rather than reinvent the wheel trying to design a lifter to fit the pan.

There has to be a way to make the pan fit with a little time spent....??? If it were me I'd ditch it for a regular valley pan anyway.

__________________
2019 Pontiac Heaven class winner

https://youtu.be/XqEydRRRwqE
The Following User Says Thank You to Formulajones For This Useful Post:
  #5  
Old 08-21-2023, 11:54 PM
Skip Fix's Avatar
Skip Fix Skip Fix is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Katy,TX USA
Posts: 21,708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan65 View Post
Singleton,

For the guy that wants to keep the "EGR" valley pan, there are no other hydraulic roller choices I am aware of. It would definitely be for the "mild" build setup.

It's just a spit ball idea. Not in it to make a business. It's just a hobby and I like a challenge.

Here's to the "you can't fit a finned aluminum timing cover under the water pump on a 409" so I made my own. It was marketed for a few years by a buddy until he retired. I have the knowledge and ability, and he had the CNC mill.

Thanks,
Stan
Nice cover!

__________________
Skip Fix
1978 Trans Am original owner 10.99 @ 124 pump gas 455 E heads, NO Bird ever!
1981 Black SE Trans Am stockish 6X 400ci, turbo 301 on a stand
1965 GTO 4 barrel 3 speed project
2004 GTO Pulse Red stock motor computer tune [email protected]
1964 Impala SS 409/470ci 600 HP stroker project
1979 Camaro IAII Edelbrock head 500" 695 HP 10.33@132 3595lbs
1964 Corvette Coupe 327 4 speed
The Following User Says Thank You to Skip Fix For This Useful Post:
  #6  
Old 02-11-2024, 11:24 AM
Stan65 Stan65 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Toledo, IL
Posts: 347
Default

I’m still working that out for options, but the fallback will be the modified ford spider.

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Stan65 For This Useful Post:
  #7  
Old 02-11-2024, 12:11 PM
Formulajones's Avatar
Formulajones Formulajones is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 11,928
Default

So what's the max lift this thing will support?

That's really the deal breaker for me and why I had to ditch the idea of using the factory roller setup on a Gen V BBC and convert it to link bar, it was all finished at .350 lobe lift which meant I couldn't even get a cam in there with more than .600" lift at the valve and that wasn't going to get the job done.

__________________
2019 Pontiac Heaven class winner

https://youtu.be/XqEydRRRwqE
  #8  
Old 02-11-2024, 01:07 PM
Singleton Singleton is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: coastal Alabama
Posts: 1,232
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Formulajones View Post
So what's the max lift this thing will support?
I don't have the answer, but from another thread from someone that is using them, "To use the HT2148 lifters, cam base circle must be at least 1.135” diameter".

If that is the case, anything less than 1.135" base circle would allow the lifter oil feed hole/band to drop out of the bottom of the lifter bore.

Lifter oil feed hole protruding out of the lifter bore at the top at full lift shouldn't be an issue unless the top of the lifter bore has an excessive chamfer from the factory.

__________________

66 GTO, 495, M22, Strange S-60 w/4.10
Sold new at Royal Pontiac (Dealer# 07-679)

70 Formula 400/auto
The Following User Says Thank You to Singleton For This Useful Post:
  #9  
Old 12-01-2024, 03:44 PM
Stan65 Stan65 is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Toledo, IL
Posts: 347
Default

ALL,

I just measured out everything in my setup so people can reference for their own purposes.

Once again, this is with MY BLOCK

You can see the lifters work well.

My cam measures....

Base Circle 1.191
Lobe Lift .344
Journal Diameter 1.899

This means my lobe is .010 under the journal radius as expected.


One caveat!......

THE OIL HOLE IN THE LIFTER NEEDS TO FACE THE OIL HOLE IN THE BOSS THE GET OILING ON THE BASE CIRCLE!

PM me if you want a copy of the DWG file.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Lifters.jpg
Views:	246
Size:	70.9 KB
ID:	643830  


Last edited by Stan65; 12-01-2024 at 04:19 PM.
  #10  
Old 02-09-2024, 08:53 PM
gtospieg gtospieg is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,338
Default

cool...following

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:54 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017