#1  
Old 08-09-2023, 03:55 PM
Gach's Avatar
Gach Gach is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: R. I.
Posts: 4,595
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shockwave78 View Post
I actually did check the base circle difference, the new cam is 1/8 inch smaller than the factory cam
Smart move. Was you able to check valve train geometry. Other question are those same valve spring as the old cam ? Or you put new ones in.

  #2  
Old 08-09-2023, 04:17 PM
Shockwave78 Shockwave78 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Canyon, TX
Posts: 81
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gach View Post
Smart move. Was you able to check valve train geometry. Other question are those same valve spring as the old cam ? Or you put new ones in.
I have not checked the geometry yet, I replaced the valve springs with the recommended crower springs with the new cam.

  #3  
Old 08-09-2023, 04:26 PM
Gach's Avatar
Gach Gach is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: R. I.
Posts: 4,595
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shockwave78 View Post
I have not checked the geometry yet, I replaced the valve springs with the recommended crower springs with the new cam.
Great ! You did your home work thats for sure. If and when you can check valve train geometry. With the shorter base circle being 1/8” shorter. Its a good possibility, being push rods are same length as old cam. That its not opening the valves all the way. Making push rod seem shorter

  #4  
Old 08-09-2023, 04:54 PM
Shockwave78 Shockwave78 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Canyon, TX
Posts: 81
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gach View Post
Great ! You did your home work thats for sure. If and when you can check valve train geometry. With the shorter base circle being 1/8” shorter. Its a good possibility, being push rods are same length as old cam. That its not opening the valves all the way. Making push rod seem shorter
I will add that to the list of tests, taking that into account, the valve lift would be .297/.321.

  #5  
Old 08-09-2023, 07:42 PM
Shockwave78 Shockwave78 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Canyon, TX
Posts: 81
Default

Just rough checked the valve timing per Cliff's directions and it seems to be spot on. I did a compression test on the rest of the cylinders and they all returned 150, I'm not sure if the 175 was a fluke, or that was a side effect of the rockers being adjusted a certain way. I have studs arriving tomorrow as well as poly locks because I was planning on doing that anyway. I will be doing a compression test after I get the new studs installed to see if that makes a difference. My next step is pulling the carburetor off to see if there's any junk in it from sitting

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017