| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nothing wrong with stamped rockers other than they are slow moving and don't deliver the advertised ratio. I would never consider them an option on a solid roller set up or anything with a lot of lift.... There are much better options.
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to PAUL K For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
A tid bit in support of Paul's comment ?
"First of all, rocker arms rarely maintain the same ratio throughout the entire valve-lift curve because the rocker arm moves in an arc as it generates lift. Roller rockers do a good job of maintaining their stated rocker ratio throughout the entire lift curve, but the same is not always true of stock-stamped factory or budget stock replacement rocker arms. These pieces often test far short of their rated rocker ratio." Source: https://www.motortrend.com/how-to/14...amped-rockers/ ..."it's well known that the inconsistencies of stock rockers and the friction and heat they create mean there's power lost with them. " https://www.motortrend.com/how-to/su...ker-arm-ratio/ .
__________________
'70 TA / 505 cid / same engine but revised ( previous best 10.63 at 127.05 ) Old information here: http://www.hotrod.com/articles/0712p...tiac-trans-am/ Sponsor of the world's fastest Pontiac powered Ford Fairmont (engine) Best time 5.13 at 140 mph (1/8 mile) , true 10.5 tire, stock type suspension https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDoJnIP3HgE |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Steve C. For This Useful Post: | ||
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|