| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The connecting rod hone is a fixed stone, eccentric style hone. You grind the cap and rod at the parting line to give you material to remove. The honing head runs pretty slow and it is a hand process. The secret to getting perfectly round and taper free big ends lies in the process. You hone the rods in pairs. This covers more of the stone. You move the rods over the stones with a prescribed stroke speed and pressure, say 5 strokes to start. Then you swap the front and rear rod position and do 5 more strokes. Then you flip the rods over and do 5 more strokes. Then you switch inside and outside for the final 5 strokes. That completes 1 cycle. Then measure. As you get close to zero, the number of strokes decreases, possibly down to 1. This gets every part of the rod on every part of the stone. Once you get the hang of it, the rods can be made near perfect. 0.0000 +- .0001" is not that difficult. You want 60% or more of the rod right on spec. The parting line +- 10% on each side will be large on purpose. This is to prevent pinching and spinning a bearing under extreme load. Each reconditioning procedure does make the rods effectively shorter. So that needs to be addressed with your deck height and so forth for a race build. Hope this makes sense.
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mgarblik For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Eric
__________________
"Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth" noted philosopher Mike Tyson Life begins at the end of your comfort zone. The mind, once stretched by a new idea, never returns to its original dimensions. |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Elarson For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'm still too ignorant to know what an "eccentric style" hone is, but I'll look that up. I still don't understand how the material removal can be "selective" around the circumference of the bore but obviously it is, at least with you as the machinist! The experience factor needed to get your results sounds significant... something as seemingly simple as doing two at a time to distribute the loads and reduce taper probably isn't obvious to many. Impressive results! Mike |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am going to try and attach a Youtube link that shows the machine in operation.
You can see the off center running of the honing machine clearly. The operator doesn't have a smooth stroke or pattern which makes perfect results difficult. He also is doing one at a time which is slower and typically produces some taper and wears the stones unevenly. But at least you sort of get an idea of how the process works. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5UqmpMME88 |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mgarblik For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks again Mike
I've still got lots of questions but won't destroy this great thread. ![]() Mike |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have weighed a few other SD parts vs regular 73 455 parts for general knowledge. Basically the the weight of the crankshaft and the block are statistically insignificant in difference. The bare blocks were SD-455 174.5 lbs. and the regular 455 was 175.35 lbs. The regular block did have freeze plugs in it and a dipstick tube. So really the same weight with all those strength enhancements. The crankshafts were SD-455 72.1 lbs. Regular 455 was 72.35 lbs. The cranks look virtually the same. Possibly a tiny bit more radius on the SD crank but it was ground .010-.010, so really can't say. No chamfer on the SD oil holes at all. Nothing special there. Going to begin reassembly soon.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance. Dr. Thomas Sowell |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Been reading since the beginning. This is why this board trumps most all the other boards, fb, etc. Detailed, well explained from a guy willing to teach.
__________________
" Is wearing a helmet illegal" Mike Kerr 1-29-09 |
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to 4dblnkldude For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
The amount of knowledge and experience (and the way people share it) on this board is fantastic. Very impressive.
__________________
70 TA, 467 cid IAII, Edelbrock D-port heads, 9.94:1, Butler HR 236/242 @ .050, 520/540 lift, 112 LSA, Q-jet, TKX (2.87 1st/.81 OD), 3.31 rear https://youtube.com/shorts/gG15nb4FWeo?feature=share Last edited by jhein; 01-23-2024 at 01:13 AM. |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jhein For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, letting them cool is important. Agree 100% Automotive rods will shrink .0002"-0003" once cooled. Sound about right? The oil probably isn't great for your skin, I imagine. But I think gloves would be a real danger in honing by hand like that. I could easily see a glove getting stuck or torn off from a stone or guide.
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to mgarblik For This Useful Post: | ||
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|