| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks - does the lower compression work better with the 110 LSA vs the 113 in my HR242 cam?
__________________
Will Rivera '69 Firebird, 400/461, 290 Eddy D-Ports, HR 230/236, 4l80E, 8.5 Rear, 3.55 gears '69 LeMans Vert, XS 350, #47 heads, TH400, 10 Bolt 3.23 gears, work in progress ‘66 Lemans, 455, 310 KRE D-Ports, HR 236/245, TH400, GV OD, 12 bolt 3.73 gears - see it here: https://youtu.be/RP_s1wJKm_Y?si=K0NZxoTyaGcj8Dcb |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
My 242/248 was also on a 110 and it worked brakes marginally, I added an extra vacuum canister and drove it like that for nearly 25 years. Dad's engine with the bigger 254/262 on a 110 didnt run brakes that well. He used a electric pump for a while but eventually switched over to hydroboost. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Another is the 455 I built for a member here. It is 9.98:1 compression and I used Paul's custom spec'd 239/243 @050 with a 112 LSA. It is also over 600 lift. That engine was built to appear stock. Stock aluminum intake q-jet RA manifolds etc....and made 507/571 on the dyno Paul uses with a really nice flat torque curve. That car drives like a stocker with a nice snug-ish converter and 3.42's and runs the power brakes and AC. A very nice well manored driver that should go into the 11's.
|
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|