#1  
Old 09-04-2024, 11:25 AM
Stan Weiss's Avatar
Stan Weiss Stan Weiss is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 5,338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt1970gto View Post
Don made a couple suggestions the other day when we spoke.. Welding the head up to reduce the cross section, going to a 2.400 valve but would still have a csa around 93% & having a different cam cut by Scott Brown. I got a quote a couple months ago of close to 10k to build a new intake.. 10k for intake, 2500 headers, rework the heads , new cam & at or above a set of tigers or pro ports. Just not sure how much more I want to go down the rabbit hole.
Matt,
If I remember correctly you and your father started out with the same head casting, but had different people do the work and, his engine had a much better torque curve.

Stan

__________________
Stan Weiss/World Wide Enterprises
Offering Performance Software Since 1987
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/carfor.htm
David Vizard & Stan Weiss' IOP / Flow / Induction Optimization - Cam Selection Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV
Download FREE 14 Trial IOP / Flow Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV/Flow_..._Day_Trial.php
Pontiac Pump Gas List
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/pont_gas.htm
Using PMD Block and Heads List
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/pont_pmd.htm
  #2  
Old 09-04-2024, 02:32 PM
Matt1970gto Matt1970gto is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2024
Posts: 90
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan Weiss View Post
Matt,
What might help is if you have data logging you could post.

Not sure what run I saved the data to simulate, but this is what I get for acceleration /G's

Stan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan Weiss View Post
Matt,
If I remember correctly you and your father started out with the same head casting, but had different people do the work and, his engine had a much better torque curve.

Stan
Stan, that is correct. Both castings were originally worked by Jim Roberson. Our engine builder wasn’t happy with them . We sent dads to someone (not sure who) that owed our builder a favor & my heads went to the guy that built my intake. With what I’m seeing on the track & what those that have looked at my heads the guy opened my up too much., Add that to a huge intake & I’m struggling. The guy never gave me the measurements but we had mine intake & dads ran through CAD. I know my runners are slightly shorter @ 5” vs 5.37 & dad’s cross section is 90% vs my 94%. I hate the idea of starting over again but I also hate the idea of throwing more $$$ into this build. We have a new profiler casting DCI 5 head but haven’t had any luck getting anyone to work it,

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:52 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017