#1  
Old 01-26-2025, 05:38 PM
Schurkey Schurkey is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Seasonally Frozen Wastelands
Posts: 6,346
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenth View Post
all mechanical fuel pumps have a check valve that prevents fuel from "flowing back into the tank".
Some pumps have two check valves--one inlet, one outlet.

Some pumps have six check valves--multiple inlet, multiple outlet for higher flow volume. No doubt over the course of automotive production, there's pumps with other numbers of check-valves.

It's entirely possible for them to not seal completely. Even slight leakage of an inlet and outlet will drain everything from the needle valve to the level of the fuel in the tank, given enough time.

Thus my suggestion to connect a vacuum pump to the inlet of the fuel pump, to see if--or how badly--the inlet check valves leak.

  #2  
Old 01-26-2025, 10:55 PM
Shiny's Avatar
Shiny Shiny is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Windsor CO
Posts: 2,481
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schurkey View Post
....
It's entirely possible for them to not seal completely. Even slight leakage of an inlet and outlet will drain everything from the needle valve to the level of the fuel in the tank, given enough time.
Good point. I have never torn a pump apart but every online drawing I find suggests the valves are simple - like a disc or flap that may not have a backing spring to hold it closed. If this is the case, and since there is no significant back-pressure or residual pressure other than the weight of the fuel, I can see how these valves could leak a little.

I think these valves are primarily designed to seal against the internal pressure as the diaphragm moves so maybe not reliable for preventing slow drain-back? They don't have to seal very well to allow the diaphragm to push fuel through the outlet.

So how to know how much they leak?

Would be interesting to know the "specs" on reverse flow rate for these valves.

If, for example, there were 3 oz of fuel in the bowl and line, then a leak would have to be 3 oz/24 hr to drain it in a day. This is over 3.5 cc/hr, which I guess is feasible but sounds like a lot....maybe not?

A 1/2cc/hr leak would drain 3 oz in about a week. That sounds feasible to me, but just guessing.....


Quote:
Originally Posted by Schurkey View Post
... Thus my suggestion to connect a vacuum pump to the inlet of the fuel pump, to see if--or how badly--the inlet check valves leak.
A vacuum pump might apply enough differential pressure to close a valve that leaks a little under just the weight of fuel above. IMO, this could fail to detect a small leak but if the outlet check valve leaked a lot, this would detect it.

Mike

  #3  
Old 01-27-2025, 01:55 PM
grivera's Avatar
grivera grivera is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Just south of Baltimore
Posts: 5,871
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiny View Post
Good point. I have never torn a pump apart but every online drawing I find suggests the valves are simple - like a disc or flap that may not have a backing spring to hold it closed. If this is the case, and since there is no significant back-pressure or residual pressure other than the weight of the fuel, I can see how these valves could leak a little.

Mike
The Carter 6907 has springs for the fuel inlet/outlet valves. The rebuild kit included new springs, pins, diaphragm, and sealing discs.

__________________
Will Rivera

'69 Firebird, 400/461, 290 Eddy D-Ports, HR 230/236, 4l80E, 8.5 Rear, 3.55 gears
'69 LeMans Vert, XS 350, #47 heads, TH400, 10 Bolt 3.23 gears, work in progress
‘66 Lemans, 455, 310 KRE D-Ports, HR 236/245, TH400, GV OD, 12 bolt 3.73 gears - see it here:
https://youtu.be/RP_s1wJKm_Y?si=K0NZxoTyaGcj8Dcb
  #4  
Old 01-27-2025, 11:08 PM
Shiny's Avatar
Shiny Shiny is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Windsor CO
Posts: 2,481
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grivera View Post
The Carter 6907 has springs for the fuel inlet/outlet valves. The rebuild kit included new springs, pins, diaphragm, and sealing discs.
Just a guess, but seems unlikely to leak a lot. Maybe others are different?

  #5  
Old 01-31-2025, 09:54 AM
chrisp chrisp is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: upper dublin Pa.
Posts: 2,998
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grivera View Post
The Carter 6907 has springs for the fuel inlet/outlet valves. The rebuild kit included new springs, pins, diaphragm, and sealing discs.
Have a 6907 & rebuild kit sealed if any in need.

  #6  
Old 01-27-2025, 11:25 AM
Kenth's Avatar
Kenth Kenth is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Kingdom of Sweden
Posts: 6,097
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schurkey View Post
Even slight leakage of an inlet and outlet will drain everything from the needle valve to the level of the fuel in the tank, given enough time.
This assumes that the inlet valve in the carburetor is at the bottom. I haven't seen any carburetors like that in the 40 that I have serviced carburetors.

__________________
1966 GTO Tri-Power
1970 GTO TheJudge
http://www.poci.org/
http://gtoaa.org/
The Following User Says Thank You to Kenth For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:30 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017