#1  
Old 01-29-2025, 09:59 PM
Dealerkiel Dealerkiel is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2025
Posts: 2
Default Anyone running this cam or suggest one.

New member. First post. Comp cams suggest this cam for my setup. Thoughts? Anyone running it. Magnum 224/224 110. HFT I want decent lope/chop but nothing outrageous. Car is a 1967 gto. Setup is
1968 400 .30 over 10.50:1ish compression 62 heads stock Rochester carb edelbrock intake. 2000 stall th400. HO exhaust. Msd dist 355 posi. Has a 204/214 112 cam in it now. I don’t want to change springs or go roller. So stock lift THANKS.

  #2  
Old 01-29-2025, 10:28 PM
JB Eng Wis JB Eng Wis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 76
Default

Comp Cams Adv duration is 270* on that camshaft ..... Im guessing your CR is more around the 10.2 : 1
That cam will make to much cranking compression & Not run on todays Permium Pump Gas....IMO
Since your new here........ Read lots of info on this fourm...... Lots of Smart Poncho People here...
Others will chim in.....we love camshaft,,,,, stuff
I think you need to lower the compression ratio or a different camshaft....... I not sure if the 068 could handle 10.2 : 1 today....

  #3  
Old 01-29-2025, 10:45 PM
67Lemons 67Lemons is offline
Chief Ponti-yacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 530
Default

Have you or the engine builder cc’d your heads & know for sure that you’re running 10:5ish compression because what Pontiac claimed for these engine stock was usually from everything that I’ve red been less than advertised compression by a point or so.

  #4  
Old 01-29-2025, 11:14 PM
jamaca85 jamaca85 is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: nampa id
Posts: 1,149
Default

cam will work I had a 400 with 62s with that cam ran mid 13s in my firebird

__________________
1970 firebird, 468, e heads,
  #5  
Old 01-29-2025, 11:15 PM
RocktimusPryme's Avatar
RocktimusPryme RocktimusPryme is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bedford, IN
Posts: 2,595
Default

Im normally all for tinkering, but if the car runs well as is, I don't know that I would take the path you are taking.

If you are limiting your cam selection to stock lift, I just don't see that you would make a gain commensurate with both the amount of work required, and even more, the risk involved in breaking in a new HFT cam.

Again, Im all for a cam change, but maybe rethink the stock lift part of it, to make sure its going to give you what you want out of it.

__________________
1967 Firebird 462 580hp/590ftlbs
1962 Pontiac Catalina Safari Swapped in Turd of an Olds 455
Owner/Creator Catfish Motorsports
https://www.youtube.com/@CatfishMotorsports
  #6  
Old 01-30-2025, 12:07 AM
steve25's Avatar
steve25 steve25 is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Westchester NY
Posts: 17,532
Default

Your cylinder pressure with #62 heads and that cam will not be an issue, but what might be an issue is the lift.

If I am not mistaken it’s .470” which will be pushing stock springs right to the limit or over seeing as you say there used and I would have to guess with over 50k miles in them.

__________________
Wernher Von Braun warned before his retirement from NASA back in 1972, that the next world war would be against the ETs!
And he was not talking about 1/8 or 1/4 mile ETs!

1) 1940s 100% silver 4 cup tea server set.

Two dry rotted 14 x 10 Micky Thompson slicks.

1) un-mailed in gift coupon from a 1972 box of corn flakes.
Two pairs of brown leather flip flops, never seen more then 2 mph.

Education is what your left with once you forget things!
  #7  
Old 01-30-2025, 07:02 AM
Kenth's Avatar
Kenth Kenth is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Kingdom of Sweden
Posts: 6,098
Default

Melling SPC-7 (068) camshaft and Crower 68404-16 valve springs will make a nice combo.
No issues with compression or carb/ignition.

__________________
1966 GTO Tri-Power
1970 GTO TheJudge
http://www.poci.org/
http://gtoaa.org/
  #8  
Old 01-30-2025, 08:34 AM
i82much's Avatar
i82much i82much is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,998
Default

man doing all the work to change a cam and then being unwilling to change the springs is just a head-scratcher for me?

The Following User Says Thank You to i82much For This Useful Post:
  #9  
Old 01-30-2025, 10:05 AM
Dealerkiel Dealerkiel is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2025
Posts: 2
Default

Only had the car a couple months but after driving, it’s leaking oil from the rear main and the oil pan and the valve covers, etc. so I’m pulling the engine and thought while it’s out put a little better cam in it. But trying to also avoid the rabbit hole of Changing this to change that to change this other thing and then all of a sudden I’ve got thousands more than what I originally just wanted to do.

  #10  
Old 01-30-2025, 10:20 AM
Steve C. Steve C. is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Liberty Hill, Tx. (Austin)
Posts: 10,929
Default

This is not a race application, however to reflect on post #8 it will be of interest to note in a race application the most highly stressed engine part is typically the valvespring.


.

__________________
'70 TA / 505 cid / same engine but revised ( previous best 10.63 at 127.05 )
Old information here:
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/0712p...tiac-trans-am/

Sponsor of the world's fastest Pontiac powered Ford Fairmont (engine)
Best time 5.13 at 140 mph (1/8 mile) , true 10.5 tire, stock type suspension
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDoJnIP3HgE
  #11  
Old 01-30-2025, 11:27 AM
PontiacHO PontiacHO is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Apr 2024
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 467
Default

I’ve ran the Comp 270 Magnum in a 402 big block Chevy. It didn’t have a lot of choppy lope but definitely could tell it was more than stock. The valve springs that Comp lists for this cam are too much. Used the 396 350 horsepower springs. It was right at 9.5 compression with no spark knock running premium fuel. Since this is a Pontiac, my opinion is stay with Pontiac profiles (lift, duration, and LSA). The Pontiac engineers got the most out of these engines without compromising reliability. The 068 should be a great cam. Use adjustable rocker nuts. If the plan is to use the tired/used valve springs………then just stay with the cam that’s currently in it. Just Another opinion….

  #12  
Old 01-30-2025, 11:30 AM
Jim Moshier's Avatar
Jim Moshier Jim Moshier is offline
Senior Chief
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Acton, CA
Posts: 335
Default

The car is new to you and that cam is a little bit bigger than stock with the converter and gears should run pretty darn good. It sounds like a nice setup, enjoy it as is fix the oil leaks and cruise it! Change the mufflers to a nice free-flowing straight thru if you want to hear the engine more Should be a fun ride!

__________________
Jim Moshier

1971 Grand Prix 462ci SD Performance 6x heads
1962 Catalina 389
1968 Firebird 400-455 I haven't decided

"If we ever forget that we're one nation under GOD, then we will be a nation gone under." - Ronald Reagan
  #13  
Old 01-30-2025, 01:48 PM
HWYSTR455's Avatar
HWYSTR455 HWYSTR455 is online now
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 16,224
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dealerkiel View Post
...But trying to also avoid the rabbit hole of Changing this to change that to change this other thing and then all of a sudden I’ve got thousands more than what I originally just wanted to do.
That would be called, as most car guys know, project creep.

First, in general, Pontiac heads tend to like a little more duration on the exhaust side, and with manifolds, I think it would be best to stick the a split-duration cam. So in that respect, the cam you have wouldn't be a first choice.

HFT cams are fairly inexpensive, all the gaskets probably cost as much. But if you're taking it out anyway, gaskets, timing cover seal, and potentially a rear main seal, is a standard approach. So swapping a cam isn't that big of a deal.

True, you should do the springs (could argue even if not changing the cam), or really, a 'top end' rebuild, like freshen the heads and valve train. A short block can go 200k plus miles, but the heads usually need to be freshened around 120k or so miles.

Having it out of the car, especially if you are doing a rear main seal, it would be good to inspect the short block. Aaaaand that would be the most likely area project creep could set in.

Talking about the rear main seal, if it's a rope seal, those have a tendency to leak after sitting for a while. They dry out and can get hard, which is when they start leaking. It is possible after 'regular' use, it could swell up enough to stop leaking.

I say just do the valve covers, timing cover seal, inspect the timing chain, drive it for a while, and if it still leaks at the rear main/pan area, then pull it. If you haven't had it long, enjoy it some.

During that time you can even save cash to cover any project creep when you do pull it.

Any idea how many miles are on the engine?



.

__________________
.

1970 GTO Judge Tribute Pro-Tour Project 535 IA2
http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=760624
1971 Trans Am 463, 315cfm E-head Sniper XFlow EFI, TKO600 extreme, 9", GW suspension, Baer brakes, pro tour car
https://forums.maxperformanceinc.com...ght=procharger
Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zKAS...ature=youtu.be
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:46 PM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017