| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Social Groups |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
70 TA, 467 cid IAII, Edelbrock D-port heads, 9.94:1, Butler HR 236/242 @ .050, 520/540 lift, 112 LSA, Q-jet, TKX (2.87 1st/.81 OD), 3.31 rear https://youtube.com/shorts/gG15nb4FWeo?feature=share |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And yes, while you may not "notice" fuel starvation, that doesn't mean it's not happening. There are rich and lean thresholds that the engine will run under. It's possible that your system provides enough fuel that the engine doesn't nose over, but without a wideband, you can't really tell if the engine is singing WOT at 5000rpm while having a 14-15:1 AFR either. But my point is that if it's not broke, why fix it? If you wanted to move to EFI, you'd pretty much be forced in this direction. If your intention is to keep the carburetor, there's less of a need here, especially if you aren't having any fuel starvation issues.
__________________
-Jason 1969 Pontiac Firebird |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think the Red Holley street pumps are quieter than they use to be. The higher pressure Blue and Black pumps are still noisier though. I would not put a Carter pump to feed a Robbmc, the Carter is a little smaller pump than a Holley. The Holley Red matches up better to the Robbmc.
I have check valves to bypass the Carter pump, which is a kit you can buy. The Carter pumps seem to have the vanes not draw in as easily as the Holley’s for running on just the Mechanical pump. I just helped a friend put on a Holley Red in series with Carter strip/street Mechanical pump. His electric pump is just on when he arms the NOS system. Otherwise it runs on the mechanical pump all the time, it has 3/8 line, 550+ HP. Last edited by Jay S; 09-19-2025 at 04:07 PM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
70 TA, 467 cid IAII, Edelbrock D-port heads, 9.94:1, Butler HR 236/242 @ .050, 520/540 lift, 112 LSA, Q-jet, TKX (2.87 1st/.81 OD), 3.31 rear https://youtube.com/shorts/gG15nb4FWeo?feature=share |
| The Following User Says Thank You to jhein For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Modifying your car to the way you want it is the fun part of this hobby! I think a Holley sniper would be great. I’d choose a northwind over a Torker II though. You can still use the shaker with the northwind btw. You just need that drop base deal.
__________________
James 1970 Trans Am Spotts Built 484" IA2, Highports, EFI Northwind, E85 Holley Terminator X sequential EFI fabrication and suspension by https://www.funkhouserracecars.com/ |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
About two years ago. frustrated with the same issue you're describing with the empty fuel bowls, I decided to ditch the mechanical pump and went with the Tanks Inc setup with the in-tank 450lph pump and 1/2" supply and return. Used a cheap quickfuel bypass regulator plumbed-in after the carb, no hobbs switch. I didn't expect any performance gains, since the car ran really strong on the street with the M&H drag radials, 495cid, 4sp, 4.10 gears. But after the electric pump install I was shocked at how quicker the engine pulled to redline. Like I said before, it ran great on the mechanical pump, but there was a noticeable difference after the Tanks Inc set up. So the dry fuel bowl issue is solved and a slight fuel starvation issue that I didn't know about is also solved. And if I decide to go EFI, most of the components are already in place
__________________
66 GTO, 495, M22, Strange S-60 w/4.10 Sold new at Royal Pontiac (Dealer# 07-679) 70 Formula 400/auto Last edited by Singleton; 09-20-2025 at 11:40 AM. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Singleton For This Useful Post: | ||
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
70 TA, 467 cid IAII, Edelbrock D-port heads, 9.94:1, Butler HR 236/242 @ .050, 520/540 lift, 112 LSA, Q-jet, TKX (2.87 1st/.81 OD), 3.31 rear https://youtube.com/shorts/gG15nb4FWeo?feature=share |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|