#1  
Old 09-19-2025, 02:59 PM
jhein's Avatar
jhein jhein is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,511
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JLMounce View Post
Yeah that's typically why they are run, for the accident based issues.

I'd talk with Tanks Inc about it. I don't know much about them, but it seems like a basic hobs switch, these are commonly run in various applications. Is it possible that the people having issues have them installed in such a way that the issue is presenting itself?

My question is how far do you want to go with this? If the only thing you're worried about is a bit of cranking if the car sits for a while, but otherwise you don't have any fuel starvation issues with your mechanical pump, is the juice worth the squeeze here?

My personal preference, but if my car has sat for a couple weeks and there's no risidual oil on the bearings, I don't mind a bit of cranking to get some oil flowing through the engine.
I don't know but people have suggested that even if I don't have any obvious starvation, it's still happening. I don't know if that only matters for someone who is racing or if would have any noticeable effect in a street only car like mine. So you are running a mechanical pump? I had you pegged for a in-tank guy.

__________________
70 TA, 467 cid IAII, Edelbrock D-port heads, 9.94:1, Butler HR 236/242 @ .050, 520/540 lift, 112 LSA, Q-jet, TKX (2.87 1st/.81 OD), 3.31 rear

https://youtube.com/shorts/gG15nb4FWeo?feature=share
  #2  
Old 09-19-2025, 03:06 PM
JLMounce JLMounce is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Greeley, Colorado
Posts: 4,540
Send a message via AIM to JLMounce
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhein View Post
I don't know but people have suggested that even if I don't have any obvious starvation, it's still happening. I don't know if that only matters for someone who is racing or if would have any noticeable effect in a street only car like mine. So you are running a mechanical pump? I had you pegged for a in-tank guy.
No, I run a FiTech system with an in-tank pump. The EFI controls everything having to do with the fuel system. If the engine stalls, the fuel pump is shut down.

And yes, while you may not "notice" fuel starvation, that doesn't mean it's not happening. There are rich and lean thresholds that the engine will run under. It's possible that your system provides enough fuel that the engine doesn't nose over, but without a wideband, you can't really tell if the engine is singing WOT at 5000rpm while having a 14-15:1 AFR either.

But my point is that if it's not broke, why fix it? If you wanted to move to EFI, you'd pretty much be forced in this direction. If your intention is to keep the carburetor, there's less of a need here, especially if you aren't having any fuel starvation issues.

__________________
-Jason
1969 Pontiac Firebird
  #3  
Old 09-19-2025, 03:49 PM
Jay S's Avatar
Jay S Jay S is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Nebraska City, Nebraska
Posts: 2,584
Default

I think the Red Holley street pumps are quieter than they use to be. The higher pressure Blue and Black pumps are still noisier though. I would not put a Carter pump to feed a Robbmc, the Carter is a little smaller pump than a Holley. The Holley Red matches up better to the Robbmc.

I have check valves to bypass the Carter pump, which is a kit you can buy. The Carter pumps seem to have the vanes not draw in as easily as the Holley’s for running on just the Mechanical pump.

I just helped a friend put on a Holley Red in series with Carter strip/street Mechanical pump. His electric pump is just on when he arms the NOS system. Otherwise it runs on the mechanical pump all the time, it has 3/8 line, 550+ HP.


Last edited by Jay S; 09-19-2025 at 04:07 PM.
  #4  
Old 09-19-2025, 06:39 PM
jhein's Avatar
jhein jhein is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,511
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JLMounce View Post
No, I run a FiTech system with an in-tank pump. The EFI controls everything having to do with the fuel system. If the engine stalls, the fuel pump is shut down.

And yes, while you may not "notice" fuel starvation, that doesn't mean it's not happening. There are rich and lean thresholds that the engine will run under. It's possible that your system provides enough fuel that the engine doesn't nose over, but without a wideband, you can't really tell if the engine is singing WOT at 5000rpm while having a 14-15:1 AFR either.

But my point is that if it's not broke, why fix it? If you wanted to move to EFI, you'd pretty much be forced in this direction. If your intention is to keep the carburetor, there's less of a need here, especially if you aren't having any fuel starvation issues.
And that's the thing. With no O2 sensor I have no idea. Plus you guys all correctly predicted the future with the 18' wheels and suspension. As you now have said, maybe soon I'll have a sniper TBI sitting on top of a Torker II or something like that.

__________________
70 TA, 467 cid IAII, Edelbrock D-port heads, 9.94:1, Butler HR 236/242 @ .050, 520/540 lift, 112 LSA, Q-jet, TKX (2.87 1st/.81 OD), 3.31 rear

https://youtube.com/shorts/gG15nb4FWeo?feature=share
The Following User Says Thank You to jhein For This Useful Post:
  #5  
Old 09-20-2025, 12:15 AM
R 70 Judge's Avatar
R 70 Judge R 70 Judge is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhein View Post
And that's the thing. With no O2 sensor I have no idea. Plus you guys all correctly predicted the future with the 18' wheels and suspension. As you now have said, maybe soon I'll have a sniper TBI sitting on top of a Torker II or something like that.
Modifying your car to the way you want it is the fun part of this hobby! I think a Holley sniper would be great. I’d choose a northwind over a Torker II though. You can still use the shaker with the northwind btw. You just need that drop base deal.

__________________
James
1970 Trans Am

Spotts Built 484" IA2, Highports, EFI Northwind, E85
Holley Terminator X sequential EFI fabrication and suspension by
https://www.funkhouserracecars.com/
  #6  
Old 09-20-2025, 11:32 AM
Singleton Singleton is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: coastal Alabama
Posts: 1,231
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhein View Post
I don't know but people have suggested that even if I don't have any obvious starvation, it's still happening. I don't know if that only matters for someone who is racing or if would have any noticeable effect in a street only car like mine.
My GTO, (in signature), had the 550 RobbMc mechanical pump for several years with no noticeable fuel supply issues. Also used the RobbMc 1/2" tank pick-up along with 1/2" lines.
About two years ago. frustrated with the same issue you're describing with the empty fuel bowls, I decided to ditch the mechanical pump and went with the Tanks Inc setup with the in-tank 450lph pump and 1/2" supply and return. Used a cheap quickfuel bypass regulator plumbed-in after the carb, no hobbs switch.

I didn't expect any performance gains, since the car ran really strong on the street with the M&H drag radials, 495cid, 4sp, 4.10 gears. But after the electric pump install I was shocked at how quicker the engine pulled to redline. Like I said before, it ran great on the mechanical pump, but there was a noticeable difference after the Tanks Inc set up.
So the dry fuel bowl issue is solved and a slight fuel starvation issue that I didn't know about is also solved. And if I decide to go EFI, most of the components are already in place

__________________

66 GTO, 495, M22, Strange S-60 w/4.10
Sold new at Royal Pontiac (Dealer# 07-679)

70 Formula 400/auto

Last edited by Singleton; 09-20-2025 at 11:40 AM.
The Following User Says Thank You to Singleton For This Useful Post:
  #7  
Old 09-20-2025, 11:35 AM
jhein's Avatar
jhein jhein is offline
Ultimate Warrior
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,511
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Singleton View Post
My GTO, (in signature), had the 550 RobbMc mechanical pump for several years with no noticeable fuel supply issues. Also used the RobbMc 1/2" tank pick-up along with 1/2" lines.
About two years ago. frustrated with the same issue you're describing with the empty fuel bowls, I decided to ditch the mechanical pump and went with the Tanks Inc setup with the in-tank 450lph pump and 1/2" supply and return. Used a cheap quickfuel bypass regulator plumbed-in after the carb, no hobbs switch.

I didn't expect any performance gains, since the car ran really strong on the street with the M&H drag radials, 495cid, 4sp, 4.10 gears. But after the electric pump install I was shocked at how quicker and stonger the engine pulled to redline. Like I said before, it ran great on the mechanical pump, but there was a noticeable difference after the Tanks Inc set up.
So the dry fuel bowl issue is solved and a slight fuel starvation issue that I didn't know about is also solved. And if I decide to go EFI, the components are already in place
That's great info. Thanks.

__________________
70 TA, 467 cid IAII, Edelbrock D-port heads, 9.94:1, Butler HR 236/242 @ .050, 520/540 lift, 112 LSA, Q-jet, TKX (2.87 1st/.81 OD), 3.31 rear

https://youtube.com/shorts/gG15nb4FWeo?feature=share
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:18 AM.

 

About Us

The PY Online Forums is the largest online gathering of Pontiac enthusiasts anywhere in the world. Founded in 1991, it was also the first online forum for people to gather and talk about their Pontiacs. Since then, it has become the mecca of Pontiac technical data and knowledge that no other place can surpass.

 




Copyright © 2017